Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 vs Vivo X200
The Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 and Vivo X200 sit in the same category and end up appealing to slightly different buyers. The Vivo X200 is the cheaper of the two at $599 versus $1,800, a difference of about $1,201. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 is the newer release, which usually means a faster chipset and longer software support. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 stands out for thinnest and lightest galaxy z fold ever, while Vivo X200 is praised for flagship dimensity 9400 chip at a competitive $599 price. Use the side-by-side spec table below to compare cameras, displays, battery life and connectivity in detail and decide which one fits your priorities.
Who Should Buy
Buy the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 if…
- →Thinnest and lightest Galaxy Z Fold ever
- →7.6-inch foldable inner display
- →S Pen support
Buy the Vivo X200 if…
- →Flagship Dimensity 9400 chip at a competitive $599 price
- →Triple 50MP camera with ZEISS optics and 3x optical zoom
- →5800 mAh battery with 90W charging lasts well over a day
Pros & Cons
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7
Pros
- Thinnest and lightest Galaxy Z Fold ever
- 7.6-inch foldable inner display
- S Pen support
- Snapdragon 8 Elite performance
Cons
- $1800 starting price
- Only 25W wired charging
- Cover display crease still visible
- 239g is heavy
Vivo X200
Pros
- Flagship Dimensity 9400 chip at a competitive $599 price
- Triple 50MP camera with ZEISS optics and 3x optical zoom
- 5800 mAh battery with 90W charging lasts well over a day
- Compact and light for a flagship at 202 g
- IP69 durability rating is best-in-class
Cons
- Limited global availability outside China and select markets
- Funtouch OS lacks the polish of competing skins
- 3x zoom is shorter than 5x periscope competitors
- No 200MP telephoto like the Pro model
Full Specifications
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 | Vivo X200 |
|---|---|---|
| Software | Android 15, One UI 7 | Android 15 (Funtouch OS 15) |
| Body | ||
| Weight | 239 g | 202 g |
| Material | Armor Aluminum frame | Aluminum frame, Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| IP rating | IPX8 | IP69 |
| Dimensions | 150 x 68 x 10.9 mm (folded) | 160.3 x 74.0 x 8.2 mm |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP, f/1.8, OIS | 50 MP, f/1.57, OIS |
| Front camera | 10 MP (cover), 4 MP (under display) | 32 MP, f/2.0 |
| Video | 8K@30fps | 4K@60fps |
| Telephoto | 10 MP, f/2.4, 3x optical zoom | 50 MP, f/2.57, 3x optical zoom, OIS |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP, f/2.2 | 50 MP, f/2.0, 119-degree |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage options | 256 GB, 512 GB, 1 TB | 256 GB, 512 GB |
| Battery | ||
| Capacity | 4400 mAh | 5800 mAh |
| Charging | 25W wired | 90W wired |
| Wireless charging | 15W wireless | 30W wireless |
| Display | ||
| Size | 7.6 inches (inner), 6.2 inches (cover) | 6.67 inches |
| Type | Dynamic AMOLED 2X, LTPO | LTPO AMOLED |
| Resolution | 2160 x 1856 (inner) | 2800 x 1260 |
| Refresh rate | 120Hz | 1-120Hz |
| Brightness (nits) | 2600 | 4500 |
| Processor | ||
| CPU | Octa-core | Octa-core |
| GPU | Adreno 830 | Immortalis-G925 |
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8 Elite | MediaTek Dimensity 9400 |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | ||
| NFC | ||
| USB | USB-C 3.2 | USB-C 3.2 |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
Want to compare a third product?
Add another product for a 3-way comparison.
Related Comparisons
This comparison is based on verified manufacturer specifications covering display, performance, camera, battery, and build quality. Scores are generated by analyzing specs across weighted categories on a 10-point scale. Learn more about our methodology.
Explore more in phones, see all Samsung products or all Vivo products. View full details for the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 or the Vivo X200.