Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 vs Vivo X200
The Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 and Vivo X200 sit in the same category and end up appealing to slightly different buyers. The Vivo X200 is the cheaper of the two at $599 versus $1,100, a difference of about $501. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 is the newer release, which usually means a faster chipset and longer software support. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 stands out for compact flip form factor, while Vivo X200 is praised for flagship dimensity 9400 chip at a competitive $599 price. Use the side-by-side spec table below to compare cameras, displays, battery life and connectivity in detail and decide which one fits your priorities.
Who Should Buy
Buy the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 if…
- →Compact flip form factor
- →Large 3.9-inch cover display
- →Snapdragon 8 Elite
Buy the Vivo X200 if…
- →Flagship Dimensity 9400 chip at a competitive $599 price
- →Triple 50MP camera with ZEISS optics and 3x optical zoom
- →5800 mAh battery with 90W charging lasts well over a day
Pros & Cons
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Pros
- Compact flip form factor
- Large 3.9-inch cover display
- Snapdragon 8 Elite
- IPX8 water resistance
Cons
- No telephoto camera
- 25W charging is slow
- Still visible crease on inner display
Vivo X200
Pros
- Flagship Dimensity 9400 chip at a competitive $599 price
- Triple 50MP camera with ZEISS optics and 3x optical zoom
- 5800 mAh battery with 90W charging lasts well over a day
- Compact and light for a flagship at 202 g
- IP69 durability rating is best-in-class
Cons
- Limited global availability outside China and select markets
- Funtouch OS lacks the polish of competing skins
- 3x zoom is shorter than 5x periscope competitors
- No 200MP telephoto like the Pro model
Full Specifications
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 | Vivo X200 |
|---|---|---|
| Software | Android 15, One UI 7 | Android 15 (Funtouch OS 15) |
| Body | ||
| Weight | 187 g | 202 g |
| Material | Armor Aluminum frame | Aluminum frame, Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| IP rating | IPX8 | IP69 |
| Dimensions | 85 x 72 x 14.6 mm (folded) | 160.3 x 74.0 x 8.2 mm |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP, f/1.8, OIS | 50 MP, f/1.57, OIS |
| Front camera | 10 MP, f/2.2 | 32 MP, f/2.0 |
| Video | 4K@60fps | 4K@60fps |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP, f/2.2 | 50 MP, f/2.0, 119-degree |
| Telephoto | — | 50 MP, f/2.57, 3x optical zoom, OIS |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage options | 256 GB, 512 GB | 256 GB, 512 GB |
| Battery | ||
| Capacity | 4000 mAh | 5800 mAh |
| Charging | 25W wired | 90W wired |
| Wireless charging | 15W wireless | 30W wireless |
| Display | ||
| Size | 6.7 inches (inner), 3.9 inches (cover) | 6.67 inches |
| Type | Dynamic AMOLED 2X, LTPO | LTPO AMOLED |
| Resolution | 2640 x 1080 (inner) | 2800 x 1260 |
| Refresh rate | 120Hz | 1-120Hz |
| Brightness (nits) | 2600 | 4500 |
| Processor | ||
| CPU | Octa-core | Octa-core |
| GPU | Adreno 830 | Immortalis-G925 |
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8 Elite | MediaTek Dimensity 9400 |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | ||
| NFC | ||
| USB | USB-C 3.2 | USB-C 3.2 |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
Want to compare a third product?
Add another product for a 3-way comparison.
Related Comparisons
This comparison is based on verified manufacturer specifications covering display, performance, camera, battery, and build quality. Scores are generated by analyzing specs across weighted categories on a 10-point scale. Learn more about our methodology.
Explore more in phones, see all Samsung products or all Vivo products. View full details for the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 or the Vivo X200.