Skip to content
specpair

Garmin Forerunner 265 vs Google Pixel Watch (1st Gen)

Updated Apr 2026smartwatches
Garmin Forerunner 265
Garmin
Garmin Forerunner 265
$449
8.1/10
VS

The Verdict

Garmin Forerunner 265 excels for dedicated fitness tracking with industry-leading battery life up to 13 days in smartwatch mode and 20 hours GPS tracking, plus SpO2 monitoring and comprehensive training metrics. Google Pixel Watch 1st Gen offers superior everyday smartwatch functionality with Wear OS 3.5, ECG capability, cellular connectivity, and a higher resolution 450x450 AMOLED display, though battery life maxes out at 24 hours. Forerunner 265 weighs 47g versus Pixel Watch's 36g. Price difference favors Pixel Watch at $349 versus $449. Choose Forerunner 265 if fitness tracking and battery longevity are priorities, or Pixel Watch if you need full smartwatch features, cellular independence, and Google ecosystem integration.

Value(1st Gen)
BatteryForerunner 265
Display(1st Gen)
Software(1st Gen)
health_trackingForerunner 265

Who Should Buy

Buy the Garmin Forerunner 265 if…

  • Vibrant AMOLED display is a massive upgrade over the 255's MIP screen
  • Training Readiness and Morning Report provide actionable fitness insights
  • Multi-band GPS delivers extremely accurate pace and distance tracking

Buy the Google Pixel Watch (1st Gen) if…

  • Beautiful domed glass design with smooth pebble-like aesthetic
  • Deep Fitbit integration for health tracking and premium features
  • Smooth Wear OS 3.5 with native Google Maps and Google Wallet

Category Scores

Garmin Forerunner 265
Google Pixel Watch (1st Gen)
Value
7.8
8.5
Battery
9.2
7.0
Display
8.0
8.5
Software
7.5
8.8
health_tracking
8.8
8.5

Pros & Cons

Garmin Forerunner 265

Pros

  • Vibrant AMOLED display is a massive upgrade over the 255's MIP screen
  • Training Readiness and Morning Report provide actionable fitness insights
  • Multi-band GPS delivers extremely accurate pace and distance tracking
  • 13-day battery with AMOLED is exceptional — best in its class
  • Race Widget helps plan pacing strategy for upcoming events

Cons

  • No built-in maps — only breadcrumb trail navigation
  • No music storage on the base model (265 Music has it)
  • No cellular connectivity — phone required for notifications
  • Proprietary charging cable is easy to forget when traveling

Google Pixel Watch (1st Gen)

Pros

  • Beautiful domed glass design with smooth pebble-like aesthetic
  • Deep Fitbit integration for health tracking and premium features
  • Smooth Wear OS 3.5 with native Google Maps and Google Wallet
  • Accurate heart rate and SpO2 tracking with ECG support
  • Lightweight and comfortable for all-day wear at 36 g

Cons

  • 24-hour battery life barely lasts a full day with active use
  • Thick bezels reduce the usable screen area
  • Exynos 9110 is an older chip that can feel laggy
  • Only one 41mm size option — too small for many users
  • No offline Google Maps navigation at launch

Full Specifications

SpecGarmin Forerunner 265Google Pixel Watch (1st Gen)
SoftwareGarmin OS (Connect IQ)Wear OS 3.5 by Google
Body
Weight47 g36 g (without band)
Case materialFiber-reinforced polymerRecycled stainless steel with domed Gorilla Glass 5
Water resistance5ATM5ATM
Health & Sensors
ECG
SpO₂
Skin temperature
Heart rate
Sleep tracking
Battery
Battery lifeUp to 13 days (smartwatch), 20 hrs GPSUp to 24 hours
Display
Size46mm (1.3 inches)41mm
TypeAMOLEDAMOLED, DCI-P3, Always-On
Always-on display
Resolution416 x 416450 x 450
Processor
ChipsetGarmin custom processorSamsung Exynos 9110 with Cortex-M33 co-processor
Connectivity
GPS
NFC
Wi-Fi
Cellular
Bluetooth5.05.0

This comparison is based on verified manufacturer specifications covering display, performance, camera, battery, and build quality. Scores are generated by analyzing specs across weighted categories on a 10-point scale. Learn more about our methodology.

Explore more in smartwatches, see all Garmin products or all Google products. View full details for the Garmin Forerunner 265 or the Google Pixel Watch (1st Gen).