Amazfit Bip 3 vs Samsung Galaxy Watch 5
The Verdict
Amazfit Bip 3 and Samsung Galaxy Watch 5 serve vastly different market segments. Bip 3 excels in battery longevity with its 14-day runtime and lightweight 33g design, making it ideal for fitness-focused users prioritizing endurance over features. Galaxy Watch 5 delivers premium capabilities: ECG monitoring, skin temperature sensing, dual-frequency GPS, NFC payments, and a vibrant 396x396 AMOLED display with always-on functionality. Performance-wise, Exynos W920 vastly outpaces Huami's custom processor, enabling smoother app experiences and better Wear OS compatibility. Galaxy Watch 5's wireless charging and optional LTE add convenience, though battery life drops to realistic 24-hour cycles. At $69 versus $279, Bip 3 represents exceptional budget value for basic health tracking and fitness logging. However, Galaxy Watch 5's comprehensive ecosystem integration, superior display, and advanced health sensors justify premium pricing for Android users wanting a full-featured smartwatch. Choose Bip 3 for simplicity and battery life; pick Galaxy Watch 5 for capability and daily utility.
Who Should Buy
Buy the Amazfit Bip 3 if…
- →Incredible value at $69 with heart rate, SpO2, and sleep tracking
- →14-day battery life means charging biweekly at most
- →5ATM water resistance for swimming at a budget price
Buy the Samsung Galaxy Watch 5 if…
- →Sapphire crystal display is 60% more durable than Watch 4
- →Comprehensive health suite: ECG, SpO2, skin temp, body composition
- →Dual-frequency GPS for accurate outdoor tracking
Category Scores
Pros & Cons
Amazfit Bip 3
Pros
- Incredible value at $69 with heart rate, SpO2, and sleep tracking
- 14-day battery life means charging biweekly at most
- 5ATM water resistance for swimming at a budget price
- 60 sport modes for basic activity tracking
- Lightweight at 33 g — comfortable for all-day wear
Cons
- No built-in GPS — must use connected phone GPS
- TFT LCD display is dim and washes out in direct sunlight
- 240x280 resolution makes text and icons look pixelated
- No NFC, Wi-Fi, or always-on display
- Notification handling is very basic — no actionable replies
Samsung Galaxy Watch 5
Pros
- Sapphire crystal display is 60% more durable than Watch 4
- Comprehensive health suite: ECG, SpO2, skin temp, body composition
- Dual-frequency GPS for accurate outdoor tracking
- Faster charging — 30% improvement over Galaxy Watch 4
- MIL-STD-810H military-grade durability rating
Cons
- Removed the beloved rotating bezel — now touch-only
- Battery rarely hits the advertised 40 hours in real use
- Requires a Samsung phone for ECG and blood pressure features
- Wear OS 3 app selection still lags behind Apple watchOS
Full Specifications
| Spec | Amazfit Bip 3 | Samsung Galaxy Watch 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Software | Zepp OS | Wear OS 3.5 (One UI Watch 4.5) |
| Body | ||
| Weight | 33 g | 28.7 g (40mm) / 33.5 g (44mm) |
| Case material | Polycarbonate | Aluminum with Sapphire Crystal glass |
| Water resistance | 5ATM | 5ATM + IP68, MIL-STD-810H |
| Health & Sensors | ||
| ECG | ||
| SpO₂ | ||
| Skin temperature | ||
| Heart rate | ||
| Sleep tracking | ||
| Battery | ||
| Battery life | Up to 14 days | Up to 40 hrs (typical ~24 hrs) |
| Display | ||
| Size | 1.69 inches | 40mm / 44mm |
| Type | TFT LCD | Super AMOLED |
| Always-on display | ||
| Resolution | 240 x 280 | 396 x 396 / 450 x 450 |
| Processor | ||
| Chipset | Huami custom processor | Exynos W920 |
| Connectivity | ||
| GPS | ||
| NFC | ||
| Wi-Fi | ||
| Cellular | ||
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.2 |
Related Comparisons
This comparison is based on verified manufacturer specifications covering display, performance, camera, battery, and build quality. Scores are generated by analyzing specs across weighted categories on a 10-point scale. Learn more about our methodology.
Explore more in smartwatches, see all Amazfit products or all Samsung products. View full details for the Amazfit Bip 3 or the Samsung Galaxy Watch 5.