Skip to content
specpair

Amazfit Bip 3 vs Garmin Venu 2

Updated Apr 2026smartwatches
Amazfit Bip 3
Amazfit
Amazfit Bip 3
$69
7.8/10
VS
Garmin Venu 2
Garmin
Garmin Venu 2
$399
8.6/10

The Verdict

Amazfit Bip 3 and Garmin Venu 2 serve vastly different market segments. Bip 3 delivers exceptional value at $69, offering fundamental smartwatch functions: heart rate monitoring, SpO2 tracking, sleep analysis, and impressive 14-day battery life in a lightweight 33g design. Its 1.69-inch TFT display lacks always-on capability and delivers lower resolution. Garmin Venu 2, priced at $399, justifies premium positioning with AMOLED always-on display (416x416 resolution), built-in GPS, NFC payments, Wi-Fi connectivity, and music storage. Battery drops to 11 days in standard mode but provides 8-hour GPS performance with offline music playback. Construction quality differs notably: stainless steel bezel versus polycarbonate. Budget-conscious buyers prioritizing battery longevity should choose Bip 3, while fitness enthusiasts needing comprehensive training metrics, navigation, and feature richness will find Venu 2's investment justified.

ValueBip 3
BatteryBip 3
DisplayVenu 2
SoftwareVenu 2
health_trackingVenu 2

Who Should Buy

Buy the Amazfit Bip 3 if…

  • Incredible value at $69 with heart rate, SpO2, and sleep tracking
  • 14-day battery life means charging biweekly at most
  • 5ATM water resistance for swimming at a budget price

Buy the Garmin Venu 2 if…

  • Stunning AMOLED display with always-on option
  • 11-day battery life outperforms most AMOLED smartwatches
  • Comprehensive fitness tracking with 25+ sport profiles

Category Scores

Amazfit Bip 3
Garmin Venu 2
Value
9.1
7.2
Battery
9.2
8.0
Display
6.5
9.1
Software
7.2
8.8
health_tracking
7.5
8.2

Pros & Cons

Amazfit Bip 3

Pros

  • Incredible value at $69 with heart rate, SpO2, and sleep tracking
  • 14-day battery life means charging biweekly at most
  • 5ATM water resistance for swimming at a budget price
  • 60 sport modes for basic activity tracking
  • Lightweight at 33 g — comfortable for all-day wear

Cons

  • No built-in GPS — must use connected phone GPS
  • TFT LCD display is dim and washes out in direct sunlight
  • 240x280 resolution makes text and icons look pixelated
  • No NFC, Wi-Fi, or always-on display
  • Notification handling is very basic — no actionable replies

Garmin Venu 2

Pros

  • Stunning AMOLED display with always-on option
  • 11-day battery life outperforms most AMOLED smartwatches
  • Comprehensive fitness tracking with 25+ sport profiles
  • Health Snapshot for quick 2-minute wellness checks
  • Garmin Pay for contactless payments via NFC

Cons

  • No ECG or blood pressure monitoring
  • No cellular option — requires phone for notifications
  • Limited smart features compared to Apple Watch or Wear OS
  • Third-party app ecosystem is limited
  • $399 is expensive for a non-cellular watch

Full Specifications

SpecAmazfit Bip 3Garmin Venu 2
SoftwareZepp OSGarmin proprietary OS
Body
Weight33 g49 g
Case materialPolycarbonateStainless steel bezel, fiber-reinforced polymer case
Water resistance5ATM5ATM
Health & Sensors
ECG
SpO₂
Skin temperature
Heart rate
Sleep tracking
Battery
Battery lifeUp to 14 daysUp to 11 days (smartwatch), 8 hrs GPS with music
Display
Size1.69 inches45mm
TypeTFT LCDAMOLED Always-On
Always-on display
Resolution240 x 280416 x 416
Processor
ChipsetHuami custom processorGarmin custom SoC
Connectivity
GPS
NFC
Wi-Fi
Cellular
Bluetooth5.05.1

This comparison is based on verified manufacturer specifications covering display, performance, camera, battery, and build quality. Scores are generated by analyzing specs across weighted categories on a 10-point scale. Learn more about our methodology.

Explore more in smartwatches, see all Amazfit products or all Garmin products. View full details for the Amazfit Bip 3 or the Garmin Venu 2.