Amazfit Bip 3 vs Amazfit Bip 5
The Verdict
Both smartwatches deliver solid value, but they target different priorities. Bip 3 excels with exceptional 14-day battery life and lower weight at 33g, making it ideal for users prioritizing longevity between charges. Bip 5 advances the experience with built-in GPS, a larger 1.91-inch IPS LCD display with always-on capability, higher resolution (320x380 vs 240x280), and newer Bluetooth 5.2 connectivity,all meaningful upgrades for active users who value navigation and visual clarity. Health tracking remains comparable across both models with SpO2 and heart rate monitoring. At just $20 more, Bip 5's GPS inclusion and superior display justify the investment for fitness enthusiasts, while Bip 3 remains the smart choice for users seeking maximum battery endurance and minimal daily charging hassles.
Who Should Buy
Buy the Amazfit Bip 3 if…
- →Incredible value at $69 with heart rate, SpO2, and sleep tracking
- →14-day battery life means charging biweekly at most
- →5ATM water resistance for swimming at a budget price
Buy the Amazfit Bip 5 if…
- →Incredibly affordable at $89 for a GPS smartwatch
- →10-day battery life from a large 1.91-inch display watch
- →Built-in GPS for run and walk tracking
Category Scores
Pros & Cons
Amazfit Bip 3
Pros
- Incredible value at $69 with heart rate, SpO2, and sleep tracking
- 14-day battery life means charging biweekly at most
- 5ATM water resistance for swimming at a budget price
- 60 sport modes for basic activity tracking
- Lightweight at 33 g — comfortable for all-day wear
Cons
- No built-in GPS — must use connected phone GPS
- TFT LCD display is dim and washes out in direct sunlight
- 240x280 resolution makes text and icons look pixelated
- No NFC, Wi-Fi, or always-on display
- Notification handling is very basic — no actionable replies
Amazfit Bip 5
Pros
- Incredibly affordable at $89 for a GPS smartwatch
- 10-day battery life from a large 1.91-inch display watch
- Built-in GPS for run and walk tracking
- 120+ sport modes cover most activities
- SpO2 and heart rate monitoring at budget pricing
Cons
- IPS LCD display — no AMOLED vibrancy or deep blacks
- Polycarbonate build feels cheap compared to metal alternatives
- No NFC, Wi-Fi, or cellular connectivity
- Zepp OS app ecosystem is very limited
Full Specifications
| Spec | Amazfit Bip 3 | Amazfit Bip 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Software | Zepp OS | Zepp OS |
| Body | ||
| Weight | 33 g | 26 g (without strap) |
| Case material | Polycarbonate | Polycarbonate |
| Water resistance | 5ATM | 5ATM |
| Health & Sensors | ||
| ECG | ||
| SpO₂ | ||
| Skin temperature | — | |
| Heart rate | ||
| Sleep tracking | ||
| Battery | ||
| Battery life | Up to 14 days | Up to 10 days (typical usage) |
| Display | ||
| Size | 1.69 inches | 45.4 mm (1.91 inches) |
| Type | TFT LCD | IPS LCD |
| Always-on display | ||
| Resolution | 240 x 280 | 320 x 380 |
| Processor | ||
| Chipset | Huami custom processor | Huami proprietary |
| Connectivity | ||
| GPS | ||
| NFC | ||
| Wi-Fi | ||
| Cellular | ||
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.2 |
Related Comparisons
This comparison is based on verified manufacturer specifications covering display, performance, camera, battery, and build quality. Scores are generated by analyzing specs across weighted categories on a 10-point scale. Learn more about our methodology.
Explore more in smartwatches, see all Amazfit products or all Amazfit products. View full details for the Amazfit Bip 3 or the Amazfit Bip 5.