Amazfit Bip 5 vs Fitbit Charge 6
The Verdict
Amazfit Bip 5 excels as a budget-friendly smartwatch with exceptional battery longevity (10 days vs 7 days) and a larger 1.91-inch IPS LCD display, making it ideal for users prioritizing endurance and screen real estate. Fitbit Charge 6 compensates with premium features including ECG capability, NFC for contactless payments, AMOLED display technology, and deeper Google ecosystem integration,justifying its $70 premium. Health tracking is comparable on both (SpO2, heart rate, sleep), though Fitbit adds ECG functionality. Display quality differs notably: Fitbit's AMOLED delivers superior contrast and colors despite smaller size, while Amazfit prioritizes size for easier readability. Build quality favors Fitbit with aluminum construction versus polycarbonate. For budget-conscious buyers seeking reliable tracking and battery stamina, Amazfit Bip 5 delivers exceptional value. Those willing to invest more for contactless payments, advanced cardiac monitoring, and premium materials should choose Fitbit Charge 6.
Who Should Buy
Buy the Amazfit Bip 5 if…
- →Incredibly affordable at $89 for a GPS smartwatch
- →10-day battery life from a large 1.91-inch display watch
- →Built-in GPS for run and walk tracking
Buy the Fitbit Charge 6 if…
- →ECG and built-in GPS on a fitness band at $159 is remarkable value
- →7-day battery life means weekly charging at most
- →Google Maps, YouTube Music, and Google Wallet integration
Category Scores
Pros & Cons
Amazfit Bip 5
Pros
- Incredibly affordable at $89 for a GPS smartwatch
- 10-day battery life from a large 1.91-inch display watch
- Built-in GPS for run and walk tracking
- 120+ sport modes cover most activities
- SpO2 and heart rate monitoring at budget pricing
Cons
- IPS LCD display — no AMOLED vibrancy or deep blacks
- Polycarbonate build feels cheap compared to metal alternatives
- No NFC, Wi-Fi, or cellular connectivity
- Zepp OS app ecosystem is very limited
Fitbit Charge 6
Pros
- ECG and built-in GPS on a fitness band at $159 is remarkable value
- 7-day battery life means weekly charging at most
- Google Maps, YouTube Music, and Google Wallet integration
- Physical side button returns — much better than Charge 5's touch sensor
- Slim, lightweight band form factor for 24/7 comfort
Cons
- Small screen limits app usability and readability
- Many features require Fitbit Premium subscription
- No voice assistant or microphone on the band
- Limited third-party app support compared to full smartwatches
Full Specifications
| Spec | Amazfit Bip 5 | Fitbit Charge 6 |
|---|---|---|
| Software | Zepp OS | Fitbit OS (Google integration) |
| Body | ||
| Weight | 26 g (without strap) | 37 g |
| Case material | Polycarbonate | Aluminum |
| Water resistance | 5ATM | 5ATM |
| Health & Sensors | ||
| ECG | ||
| SpO₂ | ||
| Heart rate | ||
| Sleep tracking | ||
| Skin temperature | — | |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life | Up to 10 days (typical usage) | Up to 7 days |
| Display | ||
| Size | 45.4 mm (1.91 inches) | 1.04 inches |
| Type | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| Always-on display | ||
| Resolution | 320 x 380 | 234 x 156 |
| Processor | ||
| Chipset | Huami proprietary | Fitbit custom processor |
| Connectivity | ||
| GPS | ||
| NFC | ||
| Wi-Fi | ||
| Cellular | ||
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.0 |
Related Comparisons
This comparison is based on verified manufacturer specifications covering display, performance, camera, battery, and build quality. Scores are generated by analyzing specs across weighted categories on a 10-point scale. Learn more about our methodology.
Explore more in smartwatches, see all Amazfit products or all Fitbit products. View full details for the Amazfit Bip 5 or the Fitbit Charge 6.