Sony WF-C700N vs Sony WH-1000XM3
The Verdict
Sony's WF-C700N and WH-1000XM3 serve entirely different use cases despite both offering ANC. The WF-C700N prioritizes portability with 4.6g earbuds, 7.5 hours of ANC playback, and IPX4 water resistance for $119, making it ideal for commuters and gym users. The WH-1000XM3, priced at $349, delivers substantially better audio performance with 40mm drivers, support for premium codecs like LDAC and aptX HD, and industry-leading 30-hour battery life with ANC enabled. The over-ear design provides superior noise isolation through its QN1 processor and delivers noticeably richer sound across all frequencies. Build quality differs significantly: the WH-1000XM3's 255g weight feels premium but lacks water resistance, while the WF-C700N's durability makes it workout-friendly. For casual listening and portability, the WF-C700N offers excellent value at its price point with solid ANC and a 15-hour total battery with the case. However, the WH-1000XM3 remains the superior choice for serious listeners prioritizing audio quality, comfort during extended wear, and extended travel sessions. These aren't direct competitors—choose based on lifestyle needs rather than specifications alone.
Who Should Buy
Buy the Sony WF-C700N if…
- →ANC at $119 is exceptional value — best noise cancellation under $150
- →Lightweight and comfortable for all-day wear
- →Multipoint connection handles phone and laptop simultaneously
Buy the Sony WH-1000XM3 if…
- →Outstanding ANC performance that still competes with newer models
- →Incredibly comfortable and lightweight at 255 g
- →30-hour battery with quick charge is excellent
Category Scores
Pros & Cons
Sony WF-C700N
Pros
- ANC at $119 is exceptional value — best noise cancellation under $150
- Lightweight and comfortable for all-day wear
- Multipoint connection handles phone and laptop simultaneously
- IPX4 water resistance for workouts and commuting
- 7.5-hour battery with ANC is competitive at this price
Cons
- No LDAC — limited to SBC and AAC codecs
- ANC is effective but not as strong as WF-1000XM5
- No wireless charging on the case
- Bass can sound slightly thin compared to pricier Sony models
Sony WH-1000XM3
Pros
- Outstanding ANC performance that still competes with newer models
- Incredibly comfortable and lightweight at 255 g
- 30-hour battery with quick charge is excellent
- Wide codec support including LDAC and aptX HD
- 10-minute quick charge gives 5 hours — great for travel
Cons
- Bluetooth 4.2 lacks the stability and range of newer versions
- No water resistance — not suitable for workouts
- Touch controls can be accidentally triggered
- Creaks and pressure can build on larger heads over time
Full Specifications
| Spec | Sony WF-C700N | Sony WH-1000XM3 |
|---|---|---|
| Active Noise Cancelling | ||
| Type | in-ear | over-ear |
| Weight | 4.6 g (each) | 255 g |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life | 7.5 hrs ANC on (15 hrs total with case) | 30 hrs with ANC |
| Charging | USB-C, 10 min = 1 hr playback | USB-C, 10 min = 5 hrs playback |
| Drivers | 5mm driver | 40mm Liquid Crystal Polymer dome |
| Features | Active Noise Cancellation, Ambient Sound mode, DSEE digital sound enhancement, Multipoint connection, Sony Headphones Connect app EQ customization | HD Noise Cancelling Processor QN1, Adaptive Sound Control, Touch controls on ear cup, Quick Attention mode, Speak-to-Chat (via update), DSEE HX upscaling |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wired option | ||
| Codecs | SBC, AAC | SBC, AAC, LDAC, aptX, aptX HD |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 4.2 |
| Multipoint | ||
| Water Resistance | IPX4 | None |
Want to compare a third product?
Add another product for a 3-way comparison.
Related Comparisons
This comparison is based on verified manufacturer specifications covering display, performance, camera, battery, and build quality. Scores are generated by analyzing specs across weighted categories on a 10-point scale. Learn more about our methodology.
Explore more in headphones, see all Sony products or all Sony products. View full details for the Sony WF-C700N or the Sony WH-1000XM3.