Samsung QN900F 65" 8K vs Samsung S95D 65"
The Verdict
The Samsung QN900F 65" 8K and Samsung S95D 65" sit in the same category and end up appealing to slightly different buyers. The Samsung S95D 65" is the cheaper of the two at $2,599 versus $5,000, a difference of about $2,401. The Samsung QN900F 65" 8K is the newer release, which usually means a faster chipset and longer software support. Samsung QN900F 65" 8K stands out for 8k resolution with ai upscaling, while Samsung S95D 65" is praised for matte anti-glare coating on an oled panel — best-in-class reflection handling. Use the side-by-side spec table below to compare cameras, displays, battery life and connectivity in detail and decide which one fits your priorities.
Who Should Buy
Buy the Samsung QN900F 65" 8K if…
- →8K resolution with AI upscaling
- →4000 nits peak brightness
- →NQ8 AI Gen3 processor
Buy the Samsung S95D 65" if…
- →Matte anti-glare coating on an OLED panel — best-in-class reflection handling
- →QD-OLED achieves some of the highest color volume of any consumer display
- →144Hz panel with 1ms input lag is outstanding for PC and next-gen console gaming
Pros & Cons
Samsung QN900F 65" 8K
Pros
- 8K resolution with AI upscaling
- 4000 nits peak brightness
- NQ8 AI Gen3 processor
- Wi-Fi 7 connectivity
- Infinity Screen near-bezel-less design
Cons
- $5000 starting price
- Very little native 8K content
- No Dolby Vision
- Heavy at 25.5 kg
Samsung S95D 65"
Pros
- Matte anti-glare coating on an OLED panel — best-in-class reflection handling
- QD-OLED achieves some of the highest color volume of any consumer display
- 144Hz panel with 1ms input lag is outstanding for PC and next-gen console gaming
- Thin, elegant design with a nearly bezel-free look
- All four HDMI 2.1 ports support 4K@144Hz for future-proofed connectivity
Cons
- Premium $2,599 price is hard to justify over the LG C4 for most buyers
- Tizen OS shows ads and sponsored content on the home screen
- OLED is prone to permanent burn-in with static content over time
- No Dolby Vision — Samsung still uses only HDR10+ for HDR metadata
Full Specifications
| Spec | Samsung QN900F 65" 8K | Samsung S95D 65" |
|---|---|---|
| Body | ||
| VESA mount | 300 x 300 | 400 x 300mm |
| Weight | 25.5 kg | 55.1 lbs |
| Dimensions (w/ stand) | — | 57.0 x 35.9 x 10.9 inches |
| Audio | ||
| Output (watts) | 60 | 60 |
| Dolby Atmos | ||
| Speakers | — | 4.2.2ch Object Tracking Sound+ |
| Gaming | ||
| VRR (Variable Refresh Rate) | ||
| ALLM | ||
| Input lag (ms) | — | 1 |
| Display | ||
| HDR | HDR10+, HLG | Quantum HDR OLED+, HDR10+, HLG |
| Size | 65 inches | 65" |
| Type | Neo QLED 8K | QD-OLED |
| Resolution | 7680 x 4320 | 3840 x 2160 (4K UHD) |
| Refresh rate | 120Hz | 144Hz |
| Brightness (nits) | 4000 | 2000 |
| Smart TV | ||
| Os | Tizen with Samsung Vision AI | Tizen OS |
| Voice assistant | Bixby, Alexa | Bixby, Alexa, Google Assistant |
| Processor | ||
| Chipset | NQ8 AI Gen3 | Neural Quantum Processor 4K |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax) |
| Ethernet | ||
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.2 |
| USB ports | 2 | 2 |
| HDMI ports | 4 | 4 |
Want to compare a third product?
Add another product for a 3-way comparison.
Related Comparisons
This comparison is based on verified manufacturer specifications covering display, performance, camera, battery, and build quality. Scores are generated by analyzing specs across weighted categories on a 10-point scale. Learn more about our methodology.
Explore more in tvs, see all Samsung products or all Samsung products. View full details for the Samsung QN900F 65" 8K or the Samsung S95D 65".