Samsung Galaxy A24 vs Samsung Galaxy A35
The Verdict
Samsung's Galaxy A35 justifies its $150 premium over the A24 with meaningful upgrades across key areas. Both phones share a 6.5-inch Super AMOLED display and 5000mAh battery, but the A35 features a faster 120Hz refresh rate versus 90Hz, plus superior brightness consistency. Performance differences matter: the A35's Exynos 1380 processor with Mali-G68 MP5 GPU substantially outpaces the A24's MediaTek Helio G99, delivering better gaming and multitasking capabilities. The A35 adds 5G connectivity, 4K video recording compared to 1080p, and IP67 water resistance, making it significantly more durable. Camera performance remains competitive on both, though the A35's improved telephoto lens and OIS optimization provide better zoom results. Storage expansion reaches 256GB on the A35 versus the A24's fixed 128GB. For users prioritizing durability, 5G future-proofing, and smoother performance, the Galaxy A35 represents better long-term value despite higher upfront costs.
Who Should Buy
Buy the Samsung Galaxy A24 if…
- →Super AMOLED display is rare at this price — vivid colors and deep blacks
- →OIS on main camera improves low-light and video stability
- →5000 mAh battery lasts well over a day
Buy the Samsung Galaxy A35 if…
- →Solid build with Gorilla Glass Victus+ on both sides
- →Bright 120Hz Super AMOLED display
- →Long-lasting 5000 mAh battery
Category Scores
Pros & Cons
Samsung Galaxy A24
Pros
- Super AMOLED display is rare at this price — vivid colors and deep blacks
- OIS on main camera improves low-light and video stability
- 5000 mAh battery lasts well over a day
- 90Hz refresh rate for smoother scrolling
- 25W charging is reasonable for the price class
Cons
- No 5G support — 4G LTE only
- Helio G99 struggles with demanding games
- No water resistance or IP rating
- Video recording limited to 1080p at 30fps
- Ultrawide camera at 8 MP is low resolution
Samsung Galaxy A35
Pros
- Solid build with Gorilla Glass Victus+ on both sides
- Bright 120Hz Super AMOLED display
- Long-lasting 5000 mAh battery
- IP67 water and dust resistance
- Four years of OS upgrades promised
Cons
- Only 6 GB RAM in base configuration
- Wi-Fi 5 is dated for 2024
- Exynos 1380 trails Snapdragon 7 chips
- Slow 25W charging with no in-box charger
Full Specifications
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A24 | Samsung Galaxy A35 |
|---|---|---|
| Software | Android 13 (One UI 5.1) | Android 14, One UI 6.1 |
| Body | ||
| Weight | 195 g | 209 g |
| Material | Plastic frame, glass front | Aluminum frame, Gorilla Glass Victus+ |
| IP rating | None | IP67 |
| Dimensions | 159 x 75 x 8.3 mm | 161.7 x 78.0 x 8.2 mm |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP, f/1.8, PDAF, OIS | 50 MP, f/1.8, OIS |
| Front camera | 13 MP, f/2.2 | 13 MP, f/2.2 |
| Macro | 2 MP, f/2.4 | — |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP, f/2.2 | 8 MP, f/2.2 |
| Telephoto | — | 5 MP macro |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 4 GB / 6 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage options | 128 GB | 128 GB, 256 GB |
| Battery | ||
| Capacity | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Charging | 25W wired | 25W wired |
| Wireless charging | No | — |
| Display | ||
| Size | 6.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| Type | Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| Resolution | 2340 x 1080 | 2340 x 1080 |
| Refresh rate | 90Hz | 120Hz |
| Brightness (nits) | 1000 | 1000 |
| Processor | ||
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz + 6x2.0 GHz) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz + 4x2.0 GHz) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G68 MP5 |
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G99 | Exynos 1380 |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | ||
| NFC | ||
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C 2.0 |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
Related Comparisons
This comparison is based on verified manufacturer specifications covering display, performance, camera, battery, and build quality. Scores are generated by analyzing specs across weighted categories on a 10-point scale. Learn more about our methodology.
Explore more in phones, see all Samsung products or all Samsung products. View full details for the Samsung Galaxy A24 or the Samsung Galaxy A35.