Skip to content
specpair

Samsung Galaxy A05s vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+

Updated Apr 2026phones
Samsung Galaxy A05s
Samsung
Samsung Galaxy A05s
$159
6.8/10
VS
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+
Xiaomi
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+
$449
8.4/10
Winner

The Verdict

Samsung Galaxy A05s targets budget-conscious users with a massive 6.7-inch display and reliable 5000 mAh battery, but its 60Hz PLS LCD screen, Snapdragon 680 processor, and 50 MP camera lack refinement for demanding tasks. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ demands nearly triple the investment yet delivers substantially more value across every dimension: 120Hz AMOLED display with 1800 nits brightness, MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra processor, flagship 200 MP camera with OIS, 120W charging, IP68 rating, and 5G connectivity. Performance, imaging, and display quality differences are dramatic. While the A05s suits light users seeking affordability, the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ provides superior longevity and capability. Xiaomi's offering represents genuinely better value despite higher pricing due to comprehensive feature density and performance parity with phones costing significantly more.

ValueGalaxy A05s
Camera13 Pro+
Battery13 Pro+
Display13 Pro+
Performance13 Pro+

Who Should Buy

Buy the Samsung Galaxy A05s if…

  • Extremely affordable at $159 for a Samsung smartphone
  • Large 5000 mAh battery provides two-day endurance
  • Big 6.7-inch display for media consumption

Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ if…

  • Striking 200 MP main camera with OIS
  • Vivid 1.5K AMOLED with 120Hz refresh
  • Blazing 120W HyperCharge

Category Scores

Samsung Galaxy A05s
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+
Value
8.2
8.1
Camera
6.5
8.8
Battery
7.8
8.9
Display
5.5
9.0
Performance
5.8
8.6

Pros & Cons

Samsung Galaxy A05s

Pros

  • Extremely affordable at $159 for a Samsung smartphone
  • Large 5000 mAh battery provides two-day endurance
  • Big 6.7-inch display for media consumption
  • 50 MP main camera takes acceptable daylight photos
  • 25W charging is decent for the budget segment

Cons

  • HD+ resolution is noticeably pixelated on the 6.7-inch screen
  • No 5G — 4G LTE only
  • Snapdragon 680 is slow for multitasking
  • No NFC — no contactless payments
  • Plastic build feels fragile and cheap

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+

Pros

  • Striking 200 MP main camera with OIS
  • Vivid 1.5K AMOLED with 120Hz refresh
  • Blazing 120W HyperCharge
  • IP68 dust and water resistance — rare at this price

Cons

  • Mid-tier Dimensity 7200 Ultra is not flagship-fast
  • Ultrawide and macro cameras are weak
  • No wireless charging
  • MIUI bloatware out of the box

Full Specifications

SpecSamsung Galaxy A05sXiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+
SoftwareAndroid 13 (One UI Core 5.1)Android 13, MIUI 14 (upgradable to HyperOS)
Body
Weight194 g204 g
MaterialPlastic frame and backPlastic frame, glass back
IP ratingNoneIP68
Dimensions167.0 x 77.8 x 8.8 mm161.4 x 74.2 x 8.9 mm
Camera
Main camera50 MP, f/1.8200 MP, f/1.65, OIS, Samsung HP3
Depth2 MP, f/2.4
Front camera13 MP, f/2.016 MP, f/2.4
Macro2 MP, f/2.4
Video1080p@30fps4K@30fps
Telephoto2 MP macro f/2.4
Ultrawide8 MP, f/2.2, 120-degree
Memory
RAM4 GB / 6 GB8 GB / 12 GB
Storage options64 GB, 128 GB256 GB, 512 GB
Battery
Capacity5000 mAh5000 mAh
Charging25W wired120W wired
Wireless chargingNoNo
Display
Size6.7 inches6.67 inches
TypePLS LCDAMOLED
Resolution1600 x 7202712 x 1220
Refresh rate60Hz120Hz
Brightness (nits)4001800
Processor
CPUOcta-core (4x2.4 GHz + 4x1.9 GHz)Octa-core (2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 + 6x2.0 GHz A510)
GPUAdreno 610Mali-G610 MC4
ChipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 680MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra
Connectivity
5G
NFC
USBUSB-C 2.0USB-C 2.0
Wi-FiWi-Fi 5Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth5.15.3

This comparison is based on verified manufacturer specifications covering display, performance, camera, battery, and build quality. Scores are generated by analyzing specs across weighted categories on a 10-point scale. Learn more about our methodology.

Explore more in phones, see all Samsung products or all Xiaomi products. View full details for the Samsung Galaxy A05s or the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+.

Press ? for keyboard shortcuts