Razr Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy S24
The Verdict
The Razr Ultra and Samsung Galaxy S24 sit in the same category and end up appealing to slightly different buyers. The Samsung Galaxy S24 is the cheaper of the two at $800 versus $1,499, a difference of about $699. The Razr Ultra is the newer release, which usually means a faster chipset and longer software support. Razr Ultra stands out for premium wood finish and alcantara back offer distinctive tactile design, while Samsung Galaxy S24 is praised for compact form factor with flagship features. Use the side-by-side spec table below to compare cameras, displays, battery life and connectivity in detail and decide which one fits your priorities.
Who Should Buy
Buy the Razr Ultra if…
- →Premium wood finish and Alcantara back offer distinctive tactile design
- →High-refresh 120Hz OLED display with excellent brightness for outdoor use
- →Snapdragon 8 Elite provides flagship-class performance
Buy the Samsung Galaxy S24 if…
- →Compact form factor with flagship features
- →Galaxy AI suite including live translate
- →Bright 2600-nit AMOLED display
Pros & Cons
Razr Ultra
Pros
- Premium wood finish and Alcantara back offer distinctive tactile design
- High-refresh 120Hz OLED display with excellent brightness for outdoor use
- Snapdragon 8 Elite provides flagship-class performance
- Compact foldable form factor with strong durability ratings
Cons
- Limited to 256GB storage with no microSD expansion
- 4000mAh battery smaller than competing flagship phones
- Premium materials may increase repair costs
- Wood finish requires careful maintenance
Samsung Galaxy S24
Pros
- Compact form factor with flagship features
- Galaxy AI suite including live translate
- Bright 2600-nit AMOLED display
- Seven years of software updates
- IP68 dust and water resistance
Cons
- Only 8 GB RAM
- Slow 25W charging
- Wi-Fi 6E instead of Wi-Fi 7
- Smaller battery than rivals
Full Specifications
| Spec | Razr Ultra | Samsung Galaxy S24 |
|---|---|---|
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50MP f/1.8 | 50 MP, f/1.8, OIS |
| Front camera | 20MP f/2.2 | 12 MP, f/2.2 |
| Telephoto | 10MP f/2.0 3x optical | 10 MP 3x optical |
| Ultrawide | 12MP f/2.2 | 12 MP, f/2.2 |
| Video | — | 8K@30fps, 4K@60fps |
| Design | ||
| Colors | Midnight Black, Wood Finish, Titanium | — |
| Weight | 189g | — |
| IP rating | IP68 | — |
| Battery | ||
| Capacity | 4000mAh | 4000 mAh |
| Charging Speed | 30W | — |
| Wireless Charging | — | |
| Charging | — | 25W wired |
| Wireless charging | — | 15W |
| Display | ||
| Size | 6.9 inches | 6.2 inches |
| Type | OLED | Dynamic AMOLED 2X LTPO |
| Brightness | 3000 nits peak | — |
| Resolution | 2640 x 1080 | 2340 x 1080 |
| Refresh rate | 120Hz | 120Hz |
| Brightness (nits) | — | 2600 |
| Performance | ||
| RAM | 12GB | — |
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8 Elite | — |
| Storage | 256GB | — |
| Software | — | Android 14, One UI 6.1 |
| Body | ||
| Weight | — | 167 g |
| Material | — | Aluminum frame, Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| IP rating | — | IP68 |
| Dimensions | — | 147.0 x 70.6 x 7.6 mm |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | — | 8 GB |
| Storage options | — | 128 GB, 256 GB, 512 GB |
| Processor | ||
| CPU | — | Deca-core (1x3.2 GHz + 2x2.9 GHz + 3x2.6 GHz + 4x1.95 GHz) |
| GPU | — | Xclipse 940 |
| Chipset | — | Exynos 2400 |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | — | |
| NFC | — | |
| USB | — | USB-C 3.2 |
| Wi-Fi | — | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.3 |
Want to compare a third product?
Add another product for a 3-way comparison.
Related Comparisons
Explore more in phones, see all Motorola products or all Samsung products. View full details for the Razr Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy S24.