Motorola Razr (2023) vs Samsung Galaxy A25
The Verdict
Motorola's Razr (2023) commands a premium at $699 with its distinctive folding design, 144Hz pOLED main display, and Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 processor delivering stronger gaming and app performance. Samsung's Galaxy A25 ($249.99) offers exceptional value with a larger 5000mAh battery, superior IP67 water resistance, and more practical everyday durability through polycarbonate construction. Display quality favors Motorola with 1400 nits brightness and 144Hz refresh, while Samsung counters with vibrant Super AMOLED technology and Android 14. Camera systems are comparable, though Motorola's 64MP main sensor with OIS provides slight edge. Battery longevity decisively favors the A25's larger capacity, crucial for all-day use. Choose the Razr for innovative form factor and performance, or select the Galaxy A25 for reliable daily driver functionality at one-third the cost.
Who Should Buy
Buy the Motorola Razr (2023) if…
- →Most affordable clamshell foldable at $699 launch price
- →Stylish vegan leather finish and compact folded design
- →144Hz pOLED main display is smooth and vibrant
Buy the Samsung Galaxy A25 if…
- →Super AMOLED display at a budget price
- →OIS-stabilized 50 MP main camera
- →IP67 water resistance is rare in this price tier
Category Scores
Pros & Cons
Motorola Razr (2023)
Pros
- Most affordable clamshell foldable at $699 launch price
- Stylish vegan leather finish and compact folded design
- 144Hz pOLED main display is smooth and vibrant
- 64 MP main camera produces good daylight photos
- Compact folded form factor fits easily in any pocket
Cons
- Very small 1.5-inch cover screen limits quick interactions
- Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 mid-range chip limits performance
- 3800 mAh battery barely gets through a full day
- IP52 water resistance is minimal for a $699 phone
- Only 5W wireless charging is essentially unusable
Samsung Galaxy A25
Pros
- Super AMOLED display at a budget price
- OIS-stabilized 50 MP main camera
- IP67 water resistance is rare in this price tier
- Ships with Android 14 and four OS update promise
- 5G capable
Cons
- Exynos 1280 shows its age in demanding tasks
- Depth sensor is not a useful third camera
- No wireless charging
- Wi-Fi 5 only
Full Specifications
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2023) | Samsung Galaxy A25 |
|---|---|---|
| Software | Android 13 | Android 14, One UI 6 |
| Body | ||
| Weight | 188.6 g | 197 g |
| Material | Aluminum frame, vegan leather or glass back | Polycarbonate |
| IP rating | IP52 | IP67 |
| Dimensions | 170.8 x 73.9 x 7.2 mm (unfolded) | 161.0 x 76.5 x 7.8 mm |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP, f/1.7, PDAF, OIS | 50 MP, f/1.8, OIS |
| Front camera | 32 MP, f/2.4 | 13 MP, f/2.2 |
| Video | 4K@30fps | 4K@30fps |
| Ultrawide | 13 MP, f/2.2 | 8 MP, f/2.2 |
| Telephoto | — | 2 MP depth |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage options | 128 GB, 256 GB | 128 GB, 256 GB |
| Battery | ||
| Capacity | 3800 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Charging | 30W wired (TurboPower) | 25W wired |
| Wireless charging | 5W wireless | — |
| Display | ||
| Size | 6.9 inches (main), 1.5 inches (cover) | 6.5 inches |
| Type | pOLED, 144Hz main / OLED cover | Super AMOLED |
| Resolution | 2640 x 1080 (main) | 2340 x 1080 |
| Refresh rate | 144Hz | 120Hz |
| Brightness (nits) | 1400 | 1000 |
| Processor | ||
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz + 3x2.36 GHz + 4x1.8 GHz) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz + 6x2.0 GHz) |
| GPU | Adreno 644 | Mali-G68 MP4 |
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 | Exynos 1280 |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | ||
| NFC | ||
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C 2.0 |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.1 |
Related Comparisons
This comparison is based on verified manufacturer specifications covering display, performance, camera, battery, and build quality. Scores are generated by analyzing specs across weighted categories on a 10-point scale. Learn more about our methodology.
Explore more in phones, see all Motorola products or all Samsung products. View full details for the Motorola Razr (2023) or the Samsung Galaxy A25.