Google Pixel Watch 3 vs Withings ScanWatch 2
The Verdict
Both smartwatches deliver comprehensive health monitoring at identical price points, but serve different priorities. Google Pixel Watch 3 excels with its vibrant 2000-nit LTPO AMOLED Actua display, Wear OS 5 ecosystem integration, and complete connectivity suite including GPS and NFC for payments. Its 24-36 hour battery life proves respectable for a full-featured AMOLED device. Withings ScanWatch 2 counters with exceptional 30-day battery longevity via its hybrid analog-OLED design, making it ideal for users prioritizing minimal charging hassles. Both offer identical health features (ECG, SpO2, skin temperature, sleep tracking). Choose Pixel Watch 3 if you want a versatile smartwatch with rich apps and quick replies; select ScanWatch 2 if battery endurance and traditional watch aesthetics matter most. For most buyers seeking balanced features, Pixel Watch 3's superior display and software ecosystem edges ahead.
Who Should Buy
Buy the Google Pixel Watch 3 if…
- →Beautiful Actua display with 2000-nit peak brightness and slimmer bezels
- →Now offered in two sizes (41mm and 45mm) for better fit options
- →Deep Fitbit integration with advanced running form and cardio load metrics
Buy the Withings ScanWatch 2 if…
- →30-day battery life is unmatched — charge monthly, not daily
- →Looks like a luxury analog watch — no one will know it's smart
- →Medical-grade ECG, SpO2, and respiratory rate monitoring
Category Scores
Pros & Cons
Google Pixel Watch 3
Pros
- Beautiful Actua display with 2000-nit peak brightness and slimmer bezels
- Now offered in two sizes (41mm and 45mm) for better fit options
- Deep Fitbit integration with advanced running form and cardio load metrics
- Loss of Pulse Detection feature can summon emergency help automatically
- Improved battery life over Pixel Watch 2, up to 36 hours in Battery Saver
Cons
- Battery life still trails Samsung and Apple Ultra-tier watches
- Some advanced Fitbit features require a Premium subscription
- Not repairable — Google won't repair damaged units
- Limited third-party app selection compared to Apple Watch
- Not compatible with iPhones
Withings ScanWatch 2
Pros
- 30-day battery life is unmatched — charge monthly, not daily
- Looks like a luxury analog watch — no one will know it's smart
- Medical-grade ECG, SpO2, and respiratory rate monitoring
- Skin temperature tracking for early illness detection
- Stainless steel build is genuinely elegant
Cons
- No GPS — phone required for route tracking
- Tiny OLED sub-display limits notification readability
- No NFC for contactless payments
- No third-party apps — health tracking only
Full Specifications
| Spec | Google Pixel Watch 3 | Withings ScanWatch 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Software | Wear OS 5 | Withings OS |
| Body | ||
| Weight | 31 g (41mm, without band) | 39 g |
| Case material | Recycled aluminum | Stainless steel |
| Water resistance | 5ATM + IP68 | 5ATM |
| Health & Sensors | ||
| ECG | ||
| SpO₂ | ||
| Skin temperature | ||
| Heart rate | ||
| Sleep tracking | ||
| Battery | ||
| Battery life | Up to 24 hours with always-on display, up to 36 hours in Battery Saver | Up to 30 days |
| Display | ||
| Size | 41mm (1.2") | 42 mm |
| Type | LTPO AMOLED Actua, up to 2000 nits, 1Hz–60Hz | Hybrid analog + OLED |
| Always-on display | ||
| Resolution | 408 x 408 | Hybrid analog with OLED sub-display |
| Processor | ||
| RAM | 2 GB | — |
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon W5+ Gen 1 + Cortex M33 co-processor | Withings proprietary |
| Connectivity | ||
| GPS | ||
| NFC | ||
| Wi-Fi | ||
| Cellular | ||
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.0 |
Related Comparisons
This comparison is based on verified manufacturer specifications covering display, performance, camera, battery, and build quality. Scores are generated by analyzing specs across weighted categories on a 10-point scale. Learn more about our methodology.
Explore more in smartwatches, see all Google products or all Withings products. View full details for the Google Pixel Watch 3 or the Withings ScanWatch 2.