Skip to content
specpair

Garmin Venu 3 vs Google Pixel Watch (1st Gen)

Updated Apr 2026smartwatches
Garmin Venu 3
Garmin
Garmin Venu 3
$450
8.6/10
Winner
VS

The Verdict

Garmin Venu 3 excels for fitness-focused users with superior battery endurance, delivering up to 14 days in smartwatch mode versus Google Pixel Watch's 24 hours. Display quality matches closely, both featuring 454x450 AMOLED screens with always-on capability. Garmin's health suite includes skin temperature monitoring absent on Pixel Watch, plus specialized sports tracking and training metrics that enthusiasts appreciate. Google Pixel Watch offers cellular connectivity for standalone calling and messaging, plus deeper integration with Android ecosystem and Google services like Maps and Wallet. At $449.99 versus $349, Garmin commands a premium justified by fitness credentials and battery longevity. Pixel Watch suits mainstream Android users prioritizing seamless ecosystem integration and compact design at 36g. Choose Garmin for serious fitness tracking and multi-week battery life; select Pixel Watch for smart features and cellular independence.

Value(1st Gen)
BatteryVenu 3
DisplayTie
Software(1st Gen)
health_trackingVenu 3

Who Should Buy

Buy the Garmin Venu 3 if…

  • Outstanding 14-day battery life with AMOLED display
  • Comprehensive health tracking including ECG and skin temperature
  • Built-in speaker and microphone for calls

Buy the Google Pixel Watch (1st Gen) if…

  • Beautiful domed glass design with smooth pebble-like aesthetic
  • Deep Fitbit integration for health tracking and premium features
  • Smooth Wear OS 3.5 with native Google Maps and Google Wallet

Category Scores

Garmin Venu 3
Google Pixel Watch (1st Gen)
Value
8.1
8.5
Battery
9.1
7.2
Display
8.5
8.5
Software
8.0
8.8
health_tracking
9.2
8.4

Pros & Cons

Garmin Venu 3

Pros

  • Outstanding 14-day battery life with AMOLED display
  • Comprehensive health tracking including ECG and skin temperature
  • Built-in speaker and microphone for calls
  • Advanced sleep coaching and nap detection
  • Multi-band GNSS for accurate GPS tracking

Cons

  • No third-party app ecosystem like Wear OS
  • Limited smartwatch features compared to Apple/Samsung
  • No cellular connectivity option
  • Garmin Pay supports limited banks

Google Pixel Watch (1st Gen)

Pros

  • Beautiful domed glass design with smooth pebble-like aesthetic
  • Deep Fitbit integration for health tracking and premium features
  • Smooth Wear OS 3.5 with native Google Maps and Google Wallet
  • Accurate heart rate and SpO2 tracking with ECG support
  • Lightweight and comfortable for all-day wear at 36 g

Cons

  • 24-hour battery life barely lasts a full day with active use
  • Thick bezels reduce the usable screen area
  • Exynos 9110 is an older chip that can feel laggy
  • Only one 41mm size option — too small for many users
  • No offline Google Maps navigation at launch

Full Specifications

SpecGarmin Venu 3Google Pixel Watch (1st Gen)
SoftwareGarmin OSWear OS 3.5 by Google
Body
Weight47 g36 g (without band)
Case materialStainless steel bezel, fiber-reinforced polymer caseRecycled stainless steel with domed Gorilla Glass 5
Water resistance5 ATM5ATM
Health & Sensors
ECG
SpO₂
Skin temperature
Heart rate
Sleep tracking
Battery
Battery lifeUp to 14 days smartwatch mode, 26 hours GPSUp to 24 hours
Display
Size1.4 inch41mm
TypeAMOLEDAMOLED, DCI-P3, Always-On
Always-on display
Resolution454 x 454450 x 450
Connectivity
GPS
NFC
Wi-Fi
Cellular
Bluetooth5.05.0
Processor
ChipsetSamsung Exynos 9110 with Cortex-M33 co-processor

This comparison is based on verified manufacturer specifications covering display, performance, camera, battery, and build quality. Scores are generated by analyzing specs across weighted categories on a 10-point scale. Learn more about our methodology.

Explore more in smartwatches, see all Garmin products or all Google products. View full details for the Garmin Venu 3 or the Google Pixel Watch (1st Gen).