Framework Laptop 13 (AMD) vs MSI Thin GF63
The Verdict
Framework Laptop 13 (AMD) and MSI Thin GF63 serve distinctly different purposes. Framework prioritizes portability with its 2.87 lb chassis, superior 2256x1504 display, user-upgradeable DDR5 RAM and storage, and impressive 10-hour battery life. Its AMD Ryzen 7 7840U handles productivity tasks excellently while maintaining thin-and-light appeal. MSI Thin GF63 targets gaming and performance-focused users with RTX 4050 graphics, 144Hz refresh rate, and 12th Gen Intel processor, though it's heavier, dimmer (250 nits), and limited to 8GB DDR4 RAM. Framework offers superior repairability and longevity; MSI delivers gaming capability at lower cost. For content creators and professionals valuing portability, Framework wins decisively. Gaming enthusiasts on a budget should choose MSI. Framework Laptop 13 (AMD) is the better all-around machine.
Who Should Buy
Buy the Framework Laptop 13 (AMD) if…
- →Fully modular — RAM, SSD, battery, and ports are all user-replaceable
- →Four hot-swappable expansion card slots for USB-C, USB-A, HDMI, SD, etc.
- →Ryzen 7 7840U offers strong performance with excellent efficiency
Buy the MSI Thin GF63 if…
- →Affordable entry to RTX 40-series gaming at $699
- →144Hz display for smooth gameplay in esports titles
- →Lightweight at 1.86 kg for a 15.6-inch gaming laptop
Category Scores
Pros & Cons
Framework Laptop 13 (AMD)
Pros
- Fully modular — RAM, SSD, battery, and ports are all user-replaceable
- Four hot-swappable expansion card slots for USB-C, USB-A, HDMI, SD, etc.
- Ryzen 7 7840U offers strong performance with excellent efficiency
- Supports Linux officially — rare among major laptop brands
- 3:2 aspect ratio display is excellent for productivity and reading
Cons
- 60Hz display is behind the competition at this price
- Build quality is good but not on par with ThinkPad or MacBook
- No discrete GPU option — not for gaming or heavy creative work
- Smaller brand means fewer service centers
MSI Thin GF63
Pros
- Affordable entry to RTX 40-series gaming at $699
- 144Hz display for smooth gameplay in esports titles
- Lightweight at 1.86 kg for a 15.6-inch gaming laptop
- Good port selection including Ethernet and three USB-A ports
- Expandable storage with an extra M.2 slot
Cons
- 250-nit display brightness is very dim — poor outdoor visibility
- Only 8 GB RAM — needs immediate upgrade for modern gaming
- Build quality is plastic-heavy and feels budget
- Fan noise is significant during gaming sessions
- Battery life is poor at around 4-5 hours real-world use
Full Specifications
| Spec | Framework Laptop 13 (AMD) | MSI Thin GF63 |
|---|---|---|
| Software | Windows 11 / Linux | Windows 11 Home |
| Body | ||
| Weight | 2.87 lbs (1.3 kg) | 1.86 kg |
| Material | Recycled aluminum | Aluminum lid, plastic body |
| Dimensions | 11.67 x 8.98 x 0.63 inches | 359 x 254 x 21.7 mm |
| Ports | ||
| USB-C ports | 4 | 1 |
| HDMI | — | 1 |
| USB-A ports | — | 3 |
| Ethernet | — | |
| Headphone Jack | — | |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life | Up to 10 hours | Up to 7 hours |
| Capacity | 61 Wh | 52.4 Wh |
| Display | ||
| Size | 13.5 inches | 15.6 inches |
| Type | IPS | IPS LCD |
| Resolution | 2256 x 1504 | 1920 x 1080 |
| Refresh rate | 60Hz | 144Hz |
| Brightness (nits) | 400 | 250 |
| Storage | ||
| SSD | 512 GB PCIe Gen 4 NVMe (user-upgradeable) | 512 GB PCIe Gen 3 NVMe |
| Expandable storage | ||
| Keyboard | ||
| Backlit | ||
| Processor | ||
| RAM | 16 GB DDR5 (user-upgradeable) | 8 GB DDR4 |
| Cores | 8 cores / 16 threads | 8-core (4P + 4E) |
| Chipset | AMD Ryzen 7 7840U | 12th Gen Intel Core i5-12450H |
| Gpu | — | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 (6 GB) |
Related Comparisons
This comparison is based on verified manufacturer specifications covering display, performance, camera, battery, and build quality. Scores are generated by analyzing specs across weighted categories on a 10-point scale. Learn more about our methodology.
Explore more in laptops, see all Framework products or all MSI products. View full details for the Framework Laptop 13 (AMD) or the MSI Thin GF63.

