Skip to content
specpair

Beats Solo 3 Wireless vs Sony WF-C500

Updated Apr 2026headphones
Beats Solo 3 Wireless
Beats
Beats Solo 3 Wireless
$199
7.8/10
VS
Sony WF-C500
Sony
Sony WF-C500
$99
7.4/10

The Verdict

Beats Solo 3 and Sony WF-C500 serve entirely different use cases despite both lacking ANC. Solo 3 delivers 40-hour battery life with Apple W1 chip integration, ideal for iPhone users seeking wireless convenience and wired backup via RemoteTalk cable. Its on-ear design provides wider soundstage but weighs 215g. Sony WF-C500 offers true wireless freedom with IPX4 water resistance, 360 Reality Audio, and superior Bluetooth 5.0 connectivity at half the price. However, 10-hour earpiece battery requires frequent charging despite 20-hour case capacity. Solo 3 excels for Apple ecosystems and marathon listening; WF-C500 wins for portability, water resistance, and budget-conscious buyers. Choose Solo 3 if you prioritize battery endurance and ecosystem integration; select WF-C500 for true wireless mobility and swimming capability.

ancTie
ValueSony WF-C500
Battery3 Wireless
comfortSony WF-C500
sound_qualitySony WF-C500

Who Should Buy

Buy the Beats Solo 3 Wireless if…

  • 40-hour battery life is phenomenal — charges once a week for most users
  • Fast Fuel gives 3 hours from just 5 minutes of charging
  • W1 chip makes pairing with Apple devices instant and seamless

Buy the Sony WF-C500 if…

  • 10-hour battery life per charge is outstanding for the price
  • Compact, lightweight design disappears in the ear
  • DSEE upscaling improves compressed audio quality

Category Scores

Beats Solo 3 Wireless
Sony WF-C500
anc
5.0
5.0
Value
7.2
8.5
Battery
9.2
6.5
comfort
6.8
8.2
sound_quality
7.5
7.6

Pros & Cons

Beats Solo 3 Wireless

Pros

  • 40-hour battery life is phenomenal — charges once a week for most users
  • Fast Fuel gives 3 hours from just 5 minutes of charging
  • W1 chip makes pairing with Apple devices instant and seamless
  • Foldable and portable for commuting and travel
  • Iconic Beats styling in multiple color options

Cons

  • On-ear clamping force causes discomfort during extended sessions
  • Bass-heavy sound signature lacks detail in mids and highs
  • No ANC — you're paying for brand and battery, not noise cancellation
  • Lightning charging port instead of USB-C
  • Bluetooth 4.0 is outdated — lacks modern codec support

Sony WF-C500

Pros

  • 10-hour battery life per charge is outstanding for the price
  • Compact, lightweight design disappears in the ear
  • DSEE upscaling improves compressed audio quality
  • IPX4 sweat resistance handles workouts
  • Reliable Sony sound quality at a budget-friendly price

Cons

  • No ANC or ambient sound mode
  • No multipoint Bluetooth connection
  • No wireless charging case
  • Basic microphone quality — not ideal for calls
  • SBC/AAC only — no high-resolution codecs

Full Specifications

SpecBeats Solo 3 WirelessSony WF-C500
Active Noise Cancelling
Typeon-earin-ear
Weight215 g5.5 g (each)
Battery
Battery life40 hrs10 hrs (20 hrs total with case)
ChargingLightning, 5 min = 3 hrs (Fast Fuel)USB-C
DriversFine-tuned acoustics driver5.8mm driver
FeaturesApple W1 chip for seamless Apple pairing, Fast Fuel charging (5 min = 3 hrs), Foldable design for portability, On-ear controls, RemoteTalk cable for wired useDSEE digital sound enhancement, 360 Reality Audio, Sony Headphones Connect app, Fast Pair for Android
Connectivity
Wired option
CodecsSBC, AACSBC, AAC
Bluetooth4.0 with Apple W1 chip5.0
Multipoint
Water ResistanceNoneIPX4

This comparison is based on verified manufacturer specifications covering display, performance, camera, battery, and build quality. Scores are generated by analyzing specs across weighted categories on a 10-point scale. Learn more about our methodology.

Explore more in headphones, see all Beats products or all Sony products. View full details for the Beats Solo 3 Wireless or the Sony WF-C500.