Amazfit GTS 4 vs Samsung Galaxy Watch 6
The Verdict
Amazfit GTS 4 delivers exceptional battery life of 8 days with a vibrant 390x450 AMOLED display and comprehensive health tracking including SpO2 and heart rate monitoring. Samsung Galaxy Watch 6 counters with superior specs: Wear OS 4, ECG capabilities, skin temperature monitoring, NFC payments, cellular connectivity, and the Exynos W930 processor enabling richer app ecosystems. Display resolution favors Samsung at 480x480 versus 390x450, though both feature always-on AMOLED screens. Battery life differs dramatically,Galaxy Watch 6 manages roughly 40 hours versus GTS 4's 8 days. For users prioritizing longevity between charges and simplicity, Amazfit GTS 4 is excellent value. Samsung Galaxy Watch 6 suits those wanting advanced features, seamless Android integration, and app variety, despite requiring more frequent charging. Choose GTS 4 for budget-conscious buyers; select Galaxy Watch 6 for comprehensive smartwatch functionality.
Who Should Buy
Buy the Amazfit GTS 4 if…
- →Large 1.75" AMOLED display is bright and vivid for the price
- →Dual-band GPS provides accurate outdoor tracking rivaling Garmin
- →Ultra-lightweight at 27 g — one of the lightest smartwatches available
Buy the Samsung Galaxy Watch 6 if…
- →Thinner, lighter design than Galaxy Watch 5 with larger display
- →Comprehensive health tracking with ECG, SpO2, and skin temperature
- →Advanced sleep coaching with detailed sleep stage analysis
Category Scores
Pros & Cons
Amazfit GTS 4
Pros
- Large 1.75" AMOLED display is bright and vivid for the price
- Dual-band GPS provides accurate outdoor tracking rivaling Garmin
- Ultra-lightweight at 27 g — one of the lightest smartwatches available
- 8-day battery comfortably outlasts Apple Watch and Galaxy Watch
- 150+ sport modes cover virtually every activity
Cons
- Zepp OS has a very limited third-party app ecosystem
- No NFC for contactless payments in most markets
- Notification interaction is basic — can't reply to messages
- Build quality feels less premium than Apple or Samsung at this price
Samsung Galaxy Watch 6
Pros
- Thinner, lighter design than Galaxy Watch 5 with larger display
- Comprehensive health tracking with ECG, SpO2, and skin temperature
- Advanced sleep coaching with detailed sleep stage analysis
- Wear OS 4 brings access to Google apps including Maps and Wallet
- Body Composition analysis via bioelectrical impedance
Cons
- No rotating bezel — relies on touchscreen and digital crown only
- Best features require a Samsung Galaxy phone
- Battery life is shorter than Garmin alternatives
- Wear OS app ecosystem remains smaller than watchOS
Full Specifications
| Spec | Amazfit GTS 4 | Samsung Galaxy Watch 6 |
|---|---|---|
| Software | Zepp OS 2.0 | Wear OS 4 with One UI Watch 5 |
| Body | ||
| Weight | 27 g (without strap) | 33 g |
| Case material | Aluminum alloy | Armor Aluminum |
| Water resistance | 5ATM | 5 ATM + IP68 / MIL-STD-810H |
| Health & Sensors | ||
| ECG | ||
| SpO₂ | ||
| Skin temperature | ||
| Heart rate | ||
| Sleep tracking | ||
| Battery | ||
| Battery life | Up to 8 days (typical usage) | Up to 40 hrs (normal mode) |
| Display | ||
| Size | 42mm (1.75 inches) | 44 mm |
| Type | AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| Always-on display | ||
| Resolution | 390 x 450 | 480 x 480 |
| Processor | ||
| Chipset | Huami custom processor | Exynos W930 |
| RAM | — | 2 GB |
| Connectivity | ||
| GPS | ||
| NFC | ||
| Wi-Fi | ||
| Cellular | ||
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.3 |
Related Comparisons
This comparison is based on verified manufacturer specifications covering display, performance, camera, battery, and build quality. Scores are generated by analyzing specs across weighted categories on a 10-point scale. Learn more about our methodology.
Explore more in smartwatches, see all Amazfit products or all Samsung products. View full details for the Amazfit GTS 4 or the Samsung Galaxy Watch 6.