Amazfit GTS 4 Mini vs TicWatch Pro 5 Enduro
The Verdict
Amazfit GTS 4 Mini excels as a lightweight, affordable fitness tracker with exceptional battery longevity reaching 15 days on a single charge. Its AMOLED display and core health features like heart rate and SpO2 monitoring serve casual users well. TicWatch Pro 5 Enduro targets serious enthusiasts with a larger 48mm display, superior processor (Snapdragon W5+ Gen 1), expanded health tracking including skin temperature, and significantly longer battery endurance up to 90 hours in Smart Mode or 45 days in Essential Mode. Connectivity options on the TicWatch include NFC and WiFi versus the Amazfit's basic Bluetooth. At nearly 3.5 times the price, the TicWatch justifies its cost through advanced features, larger screen real estate, and dual-display technology. For budget-conscious buyers wanting reliable daily tracking, the GTS 4 Mini delivers strong value. Serious fitness enthusiasts willing to invest more should choose the TicWatch Pro 5 Enduro for its comprehensive feature set and exceptional battery performance.
Who Should Buy
Buy the Amazfit GTS 4 Mini if…
- →15-day battery life is exceptional for an AMOLED smartwatch
- →Very affordable at just $99 with solid fitness features
- →Lightweight at 31.2 g — comfortable for 24/7 wear and sleep tracking
Buy the TicWatch Pro 5 Enduro if…
- →Dual display system — 90-hour smart mode or 45-day essential mode
- →Full Wear OS with Google Play Store, Maps, and Google Assistant
- →Snapdragon W5+ chip delivers smooth performance for a Wear OS watch
Category Scores
Pros & Cons
Amazfit GTS 4 Mini
Pros
- 15-day battery life is exceptional for an AMOLED smartwatch
- Very affordable at just $99 with solid fitness features
- Lightweight at 31.2 g — comfortable for 24/7 wear and sleep tracking
- Built-in GPS for outdoor activity tracking
- 120+ sport modes cover nearly every activity
Cons
- No NFC for contactless payments
- Limited smart features — no app store for third-party apps
- No Wi-Fi for faster syncing or standalone functionality
- Zepp OS has fewer integrations than Wear OS or watchOS
- Small display may be hard to read for some users
TicWatch Pro 5 Enduro
Pros
- Dual display system — 90-hour smart mode or 45-day essential mode
- Full Wear OS with Google Play Store, Maps, and Google Assistant
- Snapdragon W5+ chip delivers smooth performance for a Wear OS watch
- NFC for Google Wallet and contactless payments
- Military-grade MIL-STD-810H durability
Cons
- No ECG monitoring despite the health-focused positioning
- Bulky at 48 mm — too large for small wrists
- Wear OS 3.5 — not the latest Wear OS 4
- Mobvoi's app ecosystem is less polished than Samsung or Google
Full Specifications
| Spec | Amazfit GTS 4 Mini | TicWatch Pro 5 Enduro |
|---|---|---|
| Software | Zepp OS 2.0 | Wear OS 3.5 |
| Body | ||
| Weight | 31.2 g (without strap) | 44.3 g (without strap) |
| Case material | Aluminum alloy | Stainless steel and high-strength nylon |
| Water resistance | 5ATM | 5ATM |
| Health & Sensors | ||
| ECG | ||
| SpO₂ | ||
| Skin temperature | ||
| Heart rate | ||
| Sleep tracking | ||
| Battery | ||
| Battery life | Up to 15 days (typical use) | Up to 90 hrs (Smart Mode), 45 days (Essential Mode) |
| Display | ||
| Size | 42mm | 48 mm (1.43 inches) |
| Type | AMOLED Always-On | AMOLED + FSTN dual display |
| Always-on display | ||
| Resolution | 336 x 384 | 466 x 466 |
| Processor | ||
| Chipset | Huami custom SoC | Qualcomm Snapdragon W5+ Gen 1 |
| RAM | — | 2 GB |
| Connectivity | ||
| GPS | ||
| NFC | ||
| Wi-Fi | ||
| Cellular | ||
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
Related Comparisons
This comparison is based on verified manufacturer specifications covering display, performance, camera, battery, and build quality. Scores are generated by analyzing specs across weighted categories on a 10-point scale. Learn more about our methodology.
Explore more in smartwatches, see all Amazfit products or all Mobvoi products. View full details for the Amazfit GTS 4 Mini or the TicWatch Pro 5 Enduro.