Amazfit GTR 4 vs TicWatch Pro 5
The Verdict
Both smartwatches share a 1.43-inch AMOLED display and 5 ATM water resistance, but diverge significantly in processing power and battery technology. Amazfit GTR 4 delivers exceptional battery longevity,14 days normal use, 26 days in basic mode,making it ideal for users prioritizing minimal charging hassles. TicWatch Pro 5 counters with the Snapdragon W5+ Gen 1 processor (2GB RAM vs. 1GB), enabling smoother app performance and more complex workouts through Wear OS 3.5. Its dual-layer AMOLED + FSTN display and Essential Mode battery extend to 80 hours. Health tracking mirrors between both: SPO2, heart rate, and sleep monitoring present on each. GTR 4's aluminum build weighs 34g versus Pro 5's 44.1g composite chassis. At $199 versus $349, the GTR 4 represents superior value for battery-focused users; TicWatch Pro 5 justifies its premium for those needing robust app ecosystems and sustained performance. Choose GTR 4 for longevity and simplicity; Pro 5 for capability and Wear OS flexibility.
Who Should Buy
Buy the Amazfit GTR 4 if…
- →Large 1.43" AMOLED display is sharp and vivid with always-on option
- →Dual-band GPS rivals Garmin for outdoor tracking accuracy
- →14-day battery is outstanding for an AMOLED smartwatch
Buy the TicWatch Pro 5 if…
- →Dual-layer AMOLED + FSTN display saves battery while staying readable outdoors
- →Snapdragon W5+ Gen 1 is the fastest chip in any Wear OS watch
- →Best-in-class 24-hour Wear OS battery with up to 80 hours in Essential Mode
Category Scores
Pros & Cons
Amazfit GTR 4
Pros
- Large 1.43" AMOLED display is sharp and vivid with always-on option
- Dual-band GPS rivals Garmin for outdoor tracking accuracy
- 14-day battery is outstanding for an AMOLED smartwatch
- Built-in speaker and microphone for Bluetooth phone calls
- 150+ sport modes with auto-detection for common activities
Cons
- Zepp OS app ecosystem is extremely limited
- No NFC for contactless payments in most regions
- Cannot reply to notifications — view and dismiss only
- Build quality and software polish trail Apple and Samsung
TicWatch Pro 5
Pros
- Dual-layer AMOLED + FSTN display saves battery while staying readable outdoors
- Snapdragon W5+ Gen 1 is the fastest chip in any Wear OS watch
- Best-in-class 24-hour Wear OS battery with up to 80 hours in Essential Mode
- Rugged MIL-STD-810H rated build handles extreme conditions
- Full Wear OS access with Google Maps, Wallet, and Play Store
Cons
- No ECG or skin temperature sensor at this price point
- No cellular LTE option available
- Wear OS 3.5 rather than the latest Wear OS 4
- Large, thick case may feel bulky on smaller wrists
Full Specifications
| Spec | Amazfit GTR 4 | TicWatch Pro 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Software | Zepp OS 2.0 | Wear OS 3.5 |
| Body | ||
| Weight | 52 g (without strap) | 44.1 g |
| Case material | Aluminum alloy with stainless steel crown | Nylon fiber composite |
| Water resistance | 5ATM | 5 ATM + IP68 / MIL-STD-810H |
| Health & Sensors | ||
| ECG | ||
| SpO₂ | ||
| Skin temperature | ||
| Heart rate | ||
| Sleep tracking | ||
| Battery | ||
| Battery life | Up to 14 days (typical usage) | Up to 80 hrs Essential Mode, 24 hrs Wear OS mode |
| Display | ||
| Size | 46mm (1.43 inches) | 1.43 inch |
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED + FSTN dual-layer display |
| Always-on display | ||
| Resolution | 466 x 466 | 466 x 466 |
| Processor | ||
| Chipset | Huami custom processor | Snapdragon W5+ Gen 1 |
| RAM | — | 2 GB |
| Connectivity | ||
| GPS | ||
| NFC | ||
| Wi-Fi | ||
| Cellular | ||
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.3 |
Related Comparisons
This comparison is based on verified manufacturer specifications covering display, performance, camera, battery, and build quality. Scores are generated by analyzing specs across weighted categories on a 10-point scale. Learn more about our methodology.
Explore more in smartwatches, see all Amazfit products or all Mobvoi products. View full details for the Amazfit GTR 4 or the TicWatch Pro 5.