Amazfit GTR 4 vs Samsung Galaxy Watch 5
The Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Watch 5 delivers superior health monitoring with ECG and skin temperature sensors absent on the Amazfit GTR 4, plus faster 30% charging and dual-frequency GPS for better accuracy. Its Wear OS 3.5 ecosystem offers deeper smartphone integration and app variety compared to Zepp OS's more limited library. However, Amazfit GTR 4 counters with exceptional 14-day battery life versus Galaxy Watch 5's typical 24 hours, making it ideal for users prioritizing longevity between charges. Display quality favors Samsung's Super AMOLED with higher pixel density (450x450 vs 466x466 on 1.43-inch screen), though both feature always-on capability. At $80 less, GTR 4 represents stronger value for budget-conscious buyers wanting reliable fitness tracking without premium health features. Galaxy Watch 5 suits those embedded in Samsung ecosystems or requiring comprehensive health diagnostics. Choose Galaxy Watch 5 for smartwatch completeness; select GTR 4 if battery endurance matters most.
Who Should Buy
Buy the Amazfit GTR 4 if…
- →Large 1.43" AMOLED display is sharp and vivid with always-on option
- →Dual-band GPS rivals Garmin for outdoor tracking accuracy
- →14-day battery is outstanding for an AMOLED smartwatch
Buy the Samsung Galaxy Watch 5 if…
- →Sapphire crystal display is 60% more durable than Watch 4
- →Comprehensive health suite: ECG, SpO2, skin temp, body composition
- →Dual-frequency GPS for accurate outdoor tracking
Category Scores
Pros & Cons
Amazfit GTR 4
Pros
- Large 1.43" AMOLED display is sharp and vivid with always-on option
- Dual-band GPS rivals Garmin for outdoor tracking accuracy
- 14-day battery is outstanding for an AMOLED smartwatch
- Built-in speaker and microphone for Bluetooth phone calls
- 150+ sport modes with auto-detection for common activities
Cons
- Zepp OS app ecosystem is extremely limited
- No NFC for contactless payments in most regions
- Cannot reply to notifications — view and dismiss only
- Build quality and software polish trail Apple and Samsung
Samsung Galaxy Watch 5
Pros
- Sapphire crystal display is 60% more durable than Watch 4
- Comprehensive health suite: ECG, SpO2, skin temp, body composition
- Dual-frequency GPS for accurate outdoor tracking
- Faster charging — 30% improvement over Galaxy Watch 4
- MIL-STD-810H military-grade durability rating
Cons
- Removed the beloved rotating bezel — now touch-only
- Battery rarely hits the advertised 40 hours in real use
- Requires a Samsung phone for ECG and blood pressure features
- Wear OS 3 app selection still lags behind Apple watchOS
Full Specifications
| Spec | Amazfit GTR 4 | Samsung Galaxy Watch 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Software | Zepp OS 2.0 | Wear OS 3.5 (One UI Watch 4.5) |
| Body | ||
| Weight | 52 g (without strap) | 28.7 g (40mm) / 33.5 g (44mm) |
| Case material | Aluminum alloy with stainless steel crown | Aluminum with Sapphire Crystal glass |
| Water resistance | 5ATM | 5ATM + IP68, MIL-STD-810H |
| Health & Sensors | ||
| ECG | ||
| SpO₂ | ||
| Skin temperature | ||
| Heart rate | ||
| Sleep tracking | ||
| Battery | ||
| Battery life | Up to 14 days (typical usage) | Up to 40 hrs (typical ~24 hrs) |
| Display | ||
| Size | 46mm (1.43 inches) | 40mm / 44mm |
| Type | AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| Always-on display | ||
| Resolution | 466 x 466 | 396 x 396 / 450 x 450 |
| Processor | ||
| Chipset | Huami custom processor | Exynos W920 |
| Connectivity | ||
| GPS | ||
| NFC | ||
| Wi-Fi | ||
| Cellular | ||
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.2 |
Related Comparisons
This comparison is based on verified manufacturer specifications covering display, performance, camera, battery, and build quality. Scores are generated by analyzing specs across weighted categories on a 10-point scale. Learn more about our methodology.
Explore more in smartwatches, see all Amazfit products or all Samsung products. View full details for the Amazfit GTR 4 or the Samsung Galaxy Watch 5.