Amazfit GTR 4 vs Samsung Galaxy Watch 4
The Verdict
Amazfit GTR 4 excels with exceptional 14-day battery life and bright 1.43-inch AMOLED display, making it ideal for users prioritizing longevity between charges. Samsung Galaxy Watch 4 counters with superior health tracking via ECG capability, more refined Wear OS 3.0 experience, and optional LTE connectivity for standalone calls. Galaxy Watch 4's lighter build (25.9g vs 34g) and dual size options provide better ergonomics. Battery life favors Amazfit significantly,26 days in basic mode versus Galaxy Watch 4's realistic 20 hours of daily use. App ecosystem and third-party support lean toward Samsung's Wear OS, though Amazfit's Zepp OS suffices for fitness-focused users. At $50 less, Amazfit delivers outstanding value for battery-conscious buyers; Galaxy Watch 4 justifies premium pricing through comprehensive health features and ecosystem integration. Choose Amazfit for longevity and budget-conscious fitness tracking; select Galaxy Watch 4 for advanced health monitoring and deeper smartphone integration.
Who Should Buy
Buy the Amazfit GTR 4 if…
- →Large 1.43" AMOLED display is sharp and vivid with always-on option
- →Dual-band GPS rivals Garmin for outdoor tracking accuracy
- →14-day battery is outstanding for an AMOLED smartwatch
Buy the Samsung Galaxy Watch 4 if…
- →First Samsung watch with Wear OS and Google apps integration
- →BIA sensor for body composition measurement (body fat, muscle mass)
- →Lightweight and slim design comfortable for all-day wear
Category Scores
Pros & Cons
Amazfit GTR 4
Pros
- Large 1.43" AMOLED display is sharp and vivid with always-on option
- Dual-band GPS rivals Garmin for outdoor tracking accuracy
- 14-day battery is outstanding for an AMOLED smartwatch
- Built-in speaker and microphone for Bluetooth phone calls
- 150+ sport modes with auto-detection for common activities
Cons
- Zepp OS app ecosystem is extremely limited
- No NFC for contactless payments in most regions
- Cannot reply to notifications — view and dismiss only
- Build quality and software polish trail Apple and Samsung
Samsung Galaxy Watch 4
Pros
- First Samsung watch with Wear OS and Google apps integration
- BIA sensor for body composition measurement (body fat, muscle mass)
- Lightweight and slim design comfortable for all-day wear
- ECG and blood pressure monitoring (Samsung phones only)
- Affordable entry into Samsung's smartwatch ecosystem
Cons
- Battery life of 20 hours typical requires daily charging
- Gorilla Glass DX+ scratches more easily than sapphire crystal
- Many health features locked to Samsung Galaxy phones
- Wear OS 3 was buggy at launch with limited app support
Full Specifications
| Spec | Amazfit GTR 4 | Samsung Galaxy Watch 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Software | Zepp OS 2.0 | Wear OS 3.0 (One UI Watch 4) |
| Body | ||
| Weight | 52 g (without strap) | 25.9 g (40mm) / 30.3 g (44mm) |
| Case material | Aluminum alloy with stainless steel crown | Aluminum with Corning Gorilla Glass DX+ |
| Water resistance | 5ATM | 5ATM + IP68, MIL-STD-810G |
| Health & Sensors | ||
| ECG | ||
| SpO₂ | ||
| Skin temperature | ||
| Heart rate | ||
| Sleep tracking | ||
| Battery | ||
| Battery life | Up to 14 days (typical usage) | Up to 40 hrs (typical ~20 hrs) |
| Display | ||
| Size | 46mm (1.43 inches) | 40mm / 44mm |
| Type | AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| Always-on display | ||
| Resolution | 466 x 466 | 396 x 396 / 450 x 450 |
| Processor | ||
| Chipset | Huami custom processor | Exynos W920 |
| Connectivity | ||
| GPS | ||
| NFC | ||
| Wi-Fi | ||
| Cellular | ||
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.0 |
Related Comparisons
This comparison is based on verified manufacturer specifications covering display, performance, camera, battery, and build quality. Scores are generated by analyzing specs across weighted categories on a 10-point scale. Learn more about our methodology.
Explore more in smartwatches, see all Amazfit products or all Samsung products. View full details for the Amazfit GTR 4 or the Samsung Galaxy Watch 4.