Amazfit Bip 5 vs Samsung Galaxy Watch 5
The Verdict
Amazfit Bip 5 and Samsung Galaxy Watch 5 target fundamentally different market segments. Bip 5 excels with exceptional 10-day battery life, lightweight 26g design, and accessible $89 price point, making it ideal for fitness-focused users prioritizing longevity. Galaxy Watch 5 dominates with superior Super AMOLED display (396x396 resolution), comprehensive health sensors including ECG and skin temperature monitoring, dual-frequency GPS, NFC payments, and Wear OS 3.5's robust app ecosystem,though typical 24-hour battery life requires daily charging. Build quality favors Samsung with aluminum/sapphire construction versus Amazfit's polycarbonate. For budget-conscious buyers seeking reliable activity tracking and extended battery, Bip 5 delivers remarkable value. However, users wanting advanced health features, smartwatch versatility, and seamless Samsung ecosystem integration should invest in Galaxy Watch 5. Samsung's premium experience justifies its $190 price premium for serious wearable users.
Who Should Buy
Buy the Amazfit Bip 5 if…
- →Incredibly affordable at $89 for a GPS smartwatch
- →10-day battery life from a large 1.91-inch display watch
- →Built-in GPS for run and walk tracking
Buy the Samsung Galaxy Watch 5 if…
- →Sapphire crystal display is 60% more durable than Watch 4
- →Comprehensive health suite: ECG, SpO2, skin temp, body composition
- →Dual-frequency GPS for accurate outdoor tracking
Category Scores
Pros & Cons
Amazfit Bip 5
Pros
- Incredibly affordable at $89 for a GPS smartwatch
- 10-day battery life from a large 1.91-inch display watch
- Built-in GPS for run and walk tracking
- 120+ sport modes cover most activities
- SpO2 and heart rate monitoring at budget pricing
Cons
- IPS LCD display — no AMOLED vibrancy or deep blacks
- Polycarbonate build feels cheap compared to metal alternatives
- No NFC, Wi-Fi, or cellular connectivity
- Zepp OS app ecosystem is very limited
Samsung Galaxy Watch 5
Pros
- Sapphire crystal display is 60% more durable than Watch 4
- Comprehensive health suite: ECG, SpO2, skin temp, body composition
- Dual-frequency GPS for accurate outdoor tracking
- Faster charging — 30% improvement over Galaxy Watch 4
- MIL-STD-810H military-grade durability rating
Cons
- Removed the beloved rotating bezel — now touch-only
- Battery rarely hits the advertised 40 hours in real use
- Requires a Samsung phone for ECG and blood pressure features
- Wear OS 3 app selection still lags behind Apple watchOS
Full Specifications
| Spec | Amazfit Bip 5 | Samsung Galaxy Watch 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Software | Zepp OS | Wear OS 3.5 (One UI Watch 4.5) |
| Body | ||
| Weight | 26 g (without strap) | 28.7 g (40mm) / 33.5 g (44mm) |
| Case material | Polycarbonate | Aluminum with Sapphire Crystal glass |
| Water resistance | 5ATM | 5ATM + IP68, MIL-STD-810H |
| Health & Sensors | ||
| ECG | ||
| SpO₂ | ||
| Heart rate | ||
| Sleep tracking | ||
| Skin temperature | — | |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life | Up to 10 days (typical usage) | Up to 40 hrs (typical ~24 hrs) |
| Display | ||
| Size | 45.4 mm (1.91 inches) | 40mm / 44mm |
| Type | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| Always-on display | ||
| Resolution | 320 x 380 | 396 x 396 / 450 x 450 |
| Processor | ||
| Chipset | Huami proprietary | Exynos W920 |
| Connectivity | ||
| GPS | ||
| NFC | ||
| Wi-Fi | ||
| Cellular | ||
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
Related Comparisons
This comparison is based on verified manufacturer specifications covering display, performance, camera, battery, and build quality. Scores are generated by analyzing specs across weighted categories on a 10-point scale. Learn more about our methodology.
Explore more in smartwatches, see all Amazfit products or all Samsung products. View full details for the Amazfit Bip 5 or the Samsung Galaxy Watch 5.