Amazfit Bip 5 vs Samsung Galaxy Watch 3
The Verdict
Amazfit Bip 5 excels as a budget-conscious fitness tracker with exceptional 10-day battery life, adequate health monitoring (SpO2, heart rate, sleep tracking), and a spacious 1.91-inch IPS LCD display. Samsung Galaxy Watch 3 commands premium positioning with its vibrant Super AMOLED display, comprehensive health suite including ECG capability, superior build quality (stainless steel/titanium), and robust connectivity (NFC, Wi-Fi, optional LTE). However, the Galaxy Watch 3's battery struggles to reach 2 days despite higher price. Bip 5 delivers remarkable value for casual fitness enthusiasts prioritizing longevity between charges. Galaxy Watch 3 justifies its $310 premium through ecosystem integration, advanced health features, and premium materials,ideal for Samsung users seeking a true smartwatch. Choose Bip 5 for budget-friendly daily wear; choose Galaxy Watch 3 for feature-rich smart functionality and brand continuity.
Who Should Buy
Buy the Amazfit Bip 5 if…
- →Incredibly affordable at $89 for a GPS smartwatch
- →10-day battery life from a large 1.91-inch display watch
- →Built-in GPS for run and walk tracking
Buy the Samsung Galaxy Watch 3 if…
- →Physical rotating bezel provides tactile, satisfying navigation
- →Premium stainless steel build with classic watch aesthetics
- →ECG and SpO2 monitoring were cutting-edge at launch
Category Scores
Pros & Cons
Amazfit Bip 5
Pros
- Incredibly affordable at $89 for a GPS smartwatch
- 10-day battery life from a large 1.91-inch display watch
- Built-in GPS for run and walk tracking
- 120+ sport modes cover most activities
- SpO2 and heart rate monitoring at budget pricing
Cons
- IPS LCD display — no AMOLED vibrancy or deep blacks
- Polycarbonate build feels cheap compared to metal alternatives
- No NFC, Wi-Fi, or cellular connectivity
- Zepp OS app ecosystem is very limited
Samsung Galaxy Watch 3
Pros
- Physical rotating bezel provides tactile, satisfying navigation
- Premium stainless steel build with classic watch aesthetics
- ECG and SpO2 monitoring were cutting-edge at launch
- Fall detection with automatic SOS alerts
- Thinner and lighter than Galaxy Watch (2018)
Cons
- Tizen OS is now discontinued — no new app development
- Battery life of 1.5 days typical requires frequent charging
- Older Exynos 9110 is noticeably slower than W920
- Heavy at 48-54 g — uncomfortable for sleep tracking
Full Specifications
| Spec | Amazfit Bip 5 | Samsung Galaxy Watch 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Software | Zepp OS | Tizen OS 5.5 |
| Body | ||
| Weight | 26 g (without strap) | 48.2 g (41mm) / 53.8 g (45mm) |
| Case material | Polycarbonate | Stainless Steel / Titanium |
| Water resistance | 5ATM | 5ATM + IP68, MIL-STD-810G |
| Health & Sensors | ||
| ECG | ||
| SpO₂ | ||
| Heart rate | ||
| Sleep tracking | ||
| Skin temperature | — | |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life | Up to 10 days (typical usage) | Up to 2 days (typical ~1.5 days) |
| Display | ||
| Size | 45.4 mm (1.91 inches) | 41mm / 45mm |
| Type | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| Always-on display | ||
| Resolution | 320 x 380 | 360 x 360 |
| Processor | ||
| Chipset | Huami proprietary | Exynos 9110 |
| Connectivity | ||
| GPS | ||
| NFC | ||
| Wi-Fi | ||
| Cellular | ||
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.0 |
Related Comparisons
This comparison is based on verified manufacturer specifications covering display, performance, camera, battery, and build quality. Scores are generated by analyzing specs across weighted categories on a 10-point scale. Learn more about our methodology.
Explore more in smartwatches, see all Amazfit products or all Samsung products. View full details for the Amazfit Bip 5 or the Samsung Galaxy Watch 3.