Amazfit Bip 5 vs Garmin Venu Sq 2
The Verdict
Amazfit Bip 5 and Garmin Venu Sq 2 target different budget tiers with distinct strengths. Bip 5 offers exceptional value at $89, delivering a larger 1.91-inch IPS LCD display, superior 10-day battery life, and essential health tracking including heart rate, SpO2, and sleep monitoring through Zepp OS. Its 26g lightweight design suits all-day comfort. Garmin Venu Sq 2 costs nearly three times more at $249 but justifies premium positioning through advanced features: AMOLED display technology, NFC payments, Wi-Fi connectivity, and Garmin's industry-leading fitness ecosystem with detailed workout analysis. Battery lasts 11 days in smartwatch mode, though GPS drains it to 26 hours. Both share 5ATM water resistance and lack ECG functionality. Bip 5's larger screen and battery advantage appeal to casual users seeking reliable essentials without premium pricing, while Venu Sq 2 targets fitness enthusiasts willing to invest in comprehensive health insights and contactless payments. Choose Bip 5 for budget-conscious everyday use; select Venu Sq 2 if serious fitness tracking and mobile payments justify the investment.
Who Should Buy
Buy the Amazfit Bip 5 if…
- →Incredibly affordable at $89 for a GPS smartwatch
- →10-day battery life from a large 1.91-inch display watch
- →Built-in GPS for run and walk tracking
Buy the Garmin Venu Sq 2 if…
- →11-day battery life destroys Apple Watch and Galaxy Watch endurance
- →AMOLED display with always-on mode at an affordable price
- →Garmin's best-in-class GPS accuracy for running and cycling
Category Scores
Pros & Cons
Amazfit Bip 5
Pros
- Incredibly affordable at $89 for a GPS smartwatch
- 10-day battery life from a large 1.91-inch display watch
- Built-in GPS for run and walk tracking
- 120+ sport modes cover most activities
- SpO2 and heart rate monitoring at budget pricing
Cons
- IPS LCD display — no AMOLED vibrancy or deep blacks
- Polycarbonate build feels cheap compared to metal alternatives
- No NFC, Wi-Fi, or cellular connectivity
- Zepp OS app ecosystem is very limited
Garmin Venu Sq 2
Pros
- 11-day battery life destroys Apple Watch and Galaxy Watch endurance
- AMOLED display with always-on mode at an affordable price
- Garmin's best-in-class GPS accuracy for running and cycling
- 25+ built-in sport modes with detailed workout analytics
- NFC for Garmin Pay contactless payments
Cons
- No ECG or skin temperature monitoring
- Square design is polarizing — not as elegant as round watches
- Garmin OS has far fewer third-party apps than Wear OS
- No cellular option — phone must be nearby for notifications
Full Specifications
| Spec | Amazfit Bip 5 | Garmin Venu Sq 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Software | Zepp OS | Garmin OS |
| Body | ||
| Weight | 26 g (without strap) | 38 g |
| Case material | Polycarbonate | Aluminum bezel, fiber-reinforced polymer |
| Water resistance | 5ATM | 5ATM |
| Health & Sensors | ||
| ECG | ||
| SpO₂ | ||
| Heart rate | ||
| Sleep tracking | ||
| Skin temperature | — | |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life | Up to 10 days (typical usage) | Up to 11 days (smartwatch mode), 26 hrs GPS |
| Display | ||
| Size | 45.4 mm (1.91 inches) | 40 mm (1.41 inches) |
| Type | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| Always-on display | ||
| Resolution | 320 x 380 | 320 x 360 |
| Processor | ||
| Chipset | Huami proprietary | Garmin proprietary |
| Connectivity | ||
| GPS | ||
| NFC | ||
| Wi-Fi | ||
| Cellular | ||
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.0 |
Want to compare a third product?
Add another product for a 3-way comparison.
Related Comparisons
This comparison is based on verified manufacturer specifications covering display, performance, camera, battery, and build quality. Scores are generated by analyzing specs across weighted categories on a 10-point scale. Learn more about our methodology.
Explore more in smartwatches, see all Amazfit products or all Garmin products. View full details for the Amazfit Bip 5 or the Garmin Venu Sq 2.