Amazfit Bip 3 vs Amazfit GTS 4
The Verdict
The Bip 3 delivers exceptional value for casual fitness tracking, offering a 1.69-inch TFT LCD display, SpO2 monitoring, and an impressive 14-day battery life at just $69. Its 33-gram polycarbonate body provides durability despite the basic display technology. The GTS 4, priced at $199, significantly upgrades the experience with a vibrant 1.75-inch AMOLED display (390 x 450 resolution), built-in GPS for accurate route mapping, and an aluminum alloy construction weighing only 27 grams. Both run Zepp OS and offer identical health sensors like heart rate and sleep tracking. The critical trade-off lies in battery life: the Bip 3 reaches 14 days versus the GTS 4's 8 days due to AMOLED power consumption. The GTS 4's superior display technology and GPS justify the higher price for runners or outdoor enthusiasts requiring route accuracy. However, the Bip 3 remains the smarter choice for budget-conscious users or those prioritizing battery longevity over premium features. Neither offers ECG or skin temperature sensors, keeping both firmly in the mid-range smartwatch category.
Who Should Buy
Buy the Amazfit Bip 3 if…
- →Incredible value at $69 with heart rate, SpO2, and sleep tracking
- →14-day battery life means charging biweekly at most
- →5ATM water resistance for swimming at a budget price
Buy the Amazfit GTS 4 if…
- →Large 1.75" AMOLED display is bright and vivid for the price
- →Dual-band GPS provides accurate outdoor tracking rivaling Garmin
- →Ultra-lightweight at 27 g — one of the lightest smartwatches available
Category Scores
Pros & Cons
Amazfit Bip 3
Pros
- Incredible value at $69 with heart rate, SpO2, and sleep tracking
- 14-day battery life means charging biweekly at most
- 5ATM water resistance for swimming at a budget price
- 60 sport modes for basic activity tracking
- Lightweight at 33 g — comfortable for all-day wear
Cons
- No built-in GPS — must use connected phone GPS
- TFT LCD display is dim and washes out in direct sunlight
- 240x280 resolution makes text and icons look pixelated
- No NFC, Wi-Fi, or always-on display
- Notification handling is very basic — no actionable replies
Amazfit GTS 4
Pros
- Large 1.75" AMOLED display is bright and vivid for the price
- Dual-band GPS provides accurate outdoor tracking rivaling Garmin
- Ultra-lightweight at 27 g — one of the lightest smartwatches available
- 8-day battery comfortably outlasts Apple Watch and Galaxy Watch
- 150+ sport modes cover virtually every activity
Cons
- Zepp OS has a very limited third-party app ecosystem
- No NFC for contactless payments in most markets
- Notification interaction is basic — can't reply to messages
- Build quality feels less premium than Apple or Samsung at this price
Full Specifications
| Spec | Amazfit Bip 3 | Amazfit GTS 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Software | Zepp OS | Zepp OS 2.0 |
| Body | ||
| Weight | 33 g | 27 g (without strap) |
| Case material | Polycarbonate | Aluminum alloy |
| Water resistance | 5ATM | 5ATM |
| Health & Sensors | ||
| ECG | ||
| SpO₂ | ||
| Skin temperature | ||
| Heart rate | ||
| Sleep tracking | ||
| Battery | ||
| Battery life | Up to 14 days | Up to 8 days (typical usage) |
| Display | ||
| Size | 1.69 inches | 42mm (1.75 inches) |
| Type | TFT LCD | AMOLED |
| Always-on display | ||
| Resolution | 240 x 280 | 390 x 450 |
| Processor | ||
| Chipset | Huami custom processor | Huami custom processor |
| Connectivity | ||
| GPS | ||
| NFC | ||
| Wi-Fi | ||
| Cellular | ||
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.0 |
Want to compare a third product?
Add another product for a 3-way comparison.
Related Comparisons
This comparison is based on verified manufacturer specifications covering display, performance, camera, battery, and build quality. Scores are generated by analyzing specs across weighted categories on a 10-point scale. Learn more about our methodology.
Explore more in smartwatches, see all Amazfit products or all Amazfit products. View full details for the Amazfit Bip 3 or the Amazfit GTS 4.